Advertisement

Information fusion for conflict resolution in map interpretation

  • J. G. M. Schavemaker
  • M. J. T. Reinders
Map Processing
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1389)

Abstract

In this paper we describe the implementation of a semi-automatic conversion system for utility maps, as developed in the Dutch TopSpin-PNEM project “Knowledge-based conversion of utility maps”. Besides a short description of the overall system architecture, which is presented in more detail in [8], we will focus in this paper on the interpretation part, i.e. its current status and recent improvements. As part of this discussion we elaborate on the knowledge representation and the interpretation mechanism, propose a new concept to handle multiple detectors, introduce a new judgment procedure of instances of map objects and show the necessity of explicitly specified conflict rules.

Keywords

map conversion system map interpretation knowledge representation semantic networks image detectors information fusion conflict resolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Breen and D. Monro. An evaluation of priority queues for mathematical morphology. In J. Serra and P. Soille, editors, Mathematical morphology and its applications to image processing, pages 249–256. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leo Breiman. Bias, variance, and arcing classifiers. Technical Report 460, Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 94720, April 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.P. de Knecht, J.G.M. Schavemaker, M.J.T. Reinders, and A.M. Vossepoel. Utility map reconstruction. Accepted for the IEEE Document Image Analysis Workshop, Puerto Rico, June 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.E. den Hartog and T.K. ten Kate. Finding arrows in utility maps using a neural network. In Proc. of the 12th IAPR Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (Jeruzalem), pages 190–194, October 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul D. Gader, Magdi A. Mohammed, and James M. Keller. Fusion of handwritten word classifiers. Pattern Recognition Letters, 17:577–584, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michel Grabisch. The representation of importance and interaction of features by fuzzy measures. Pattern Recognition Letters, 17:567–575, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Niemann, G.F. Sagerer, S. Schroder, and F. Kummert. ERNEST: A semantic network system for pattern understanding. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(9):883–905, September 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.W.M. Smeulders and T.K. ten Kate. Systems for map interpretation: methods engineering. In International Workshop on Graphics Recognition, pages 110–115. IAPR, August 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.F. Stubbs and N.W. Webre. Data Structures with Abstract Data Types and Pascal. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Montery, Canada, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kagan Turner and Joydeep Ghosh. Bayes error rate estimation through classifier combining. Technical Report TR-96-01-101, The Computer and Vision Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, http://www.lans.ece.utexas.edu/, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. G. M. Schavemaker
    • 1
  • M. J. T. Reinders
    • 1
  1. 1.Information and Communication Theory Group Department of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Information Technology and SystemsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations