Abstract
Crucial to the design of multi-purpose GIS is the identification of semantical differences and commonalties between the concepts held by participants. Design involves communication between the diverse groups of participants as they mitigate their differences, find common understandings, and find coherency. It is a process of negotiating semantics.
The socio-technological design methodology I present here, participatory design, is a process of negotiation and construction involving participants cultures. This process of elaborating semantics retains the essential characteristics of each culture's world-view and simultaneously connects and relates a wide range of aspects. Drawing on sociology of science literature, I refer to the artifacts and concepts that connect different cultures and world-views as boundary objects. As commonalties, portals, or differences, they represent points of tangency between different cultural, disciplinary, and organizational world-views. Through metaphors and morphisms, boundary objects are refined as the basis for collective and collaborative action.
In this paper I review the underlying theoretical work on boundary objects and describe its extension for multi-purpose GIS design. For an example of multi-purpose and multi-participant GIS I show how participative design can aid GIS design by finding semantical coherency for stable multi-purpose GIS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antenucci, J. C., Brown, K., Croswell, P. L., Kevany, M. J., & Archer, H. (1991). Geographic Information Systems: A Guide to the Technology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Bloomfield, B. P. (1992). Understanding the social practices of systems developers. Journal of Information Systems(2), 189–206.
Corcoran, E. (1992, Nov.). Building networks. Scientific American, p. 118–120.
Crausaz, P. A., & Musy, A. (1997). GESREAU, an institutional GIS for integrated water management. In B. M. F. (Ed.), IAHS Scientific Assembly, 242 (pp. 33–41). Rabat, Marocco: IAHS.
Demeritt, D. (1996). Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(3), 484–503.
Department of Commerce (1992). Spatial Data Transfer Standard(SDTS). Washington DC: Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Frank, A. U. (1992). Acquiring a digital base map — A theoretical investigation into a form of sharing data. URISA Journal, 4(1), 10–23.
Fujimura, J. H. (1988). The molecular biological bandwagon in cancer research: where social worlds meet. Social Problems, 35, 261–283.
Fujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and “Translation”. In A. Pickering (Eds.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fujimura, J. H., & Chou, D. Y. (1994). Dissent in science: Styles of scientific practice and the controversy over the cause of aids. Social Science and Medicine, 38(8), 1017–1036.
Gould, M. (1994). GIS Design: A hermeneutic view. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(9), 1105–1115.
Henderson, K. (1995). The visual culture of engineers. In S. L.Star (Eds.), The Cultures of Computing (pp. 196–217). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, The Sociological Review.
Herring, J. R. (1990). Using category theory to model GIS applications. In K. Brassel (Ed.), Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH'90), 2 (pp. 820–829). Zürich: IGU.
Horning, G. W. (1990) Information Integration for Geographic Information Systems in a Local Government Context. Master of Arts, University of Washington.
Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Finch (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 51–82). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
King, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1993). Models, facts, and the policy process: The political ecology of estimated truth. In M. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, & L. T. Stayaert (Eds.), Environmental Modeling with GIS (pp. 353–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, W. (1994). Defining semantics for spatial data transfers. In T. C. Waugh & R. G. Healey (Ed.), Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH 94), 2 (pp. 973–987). Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: IGU/AGI.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Marble, D., Calkins, H., Duecker, K., Gilliland, J., & Salomna,J. (1972). Introduction to economics of GIS and GIS design: Concepts and Methods. In R. F. Tomlinson (Ed.), Geographic Data Processing,. Ottawa
Mark, D. M. (1993). Toward a theoretical framework for geographic entity types. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Theoretical Basis for GIS (pp. 270–283).Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Montgomery, G. E. (1990, February/March). Twenty-one factors that make or break GIS projects. GIS World, p. 42–48.
Nedovic-Budic, Z. (1997). GIS Technology and Organizational Context: Interaction and Adaptation. In M. Craglia & H. Couclelis (Eds.),Geographic Information Research: Bridging the Atlantic (pp. 165–184). London: Taylor & Francis.
Nyerges, T. (1989). Schema integration analysis for the development of GIS databases. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 3(2), 153–183.
Shapiro, C. (1995). Coordination and Integration of Wetland Data for Status and Trend and Inventory Estimates (Technical Report No. 2). Federal Geographic Data Committee, Wetlands Subcommittee.
Somers, R. (1995, January). Making the GIS committee environment work. Geo Info Systems, p. 20–22.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, “Translations,” and boundary objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Suchman, L. A. (1983). Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(4), 320–328.
Sussman, R. (1996). Organizational behavior issues in the implementation of municipal GIS. In GIS/LIS '96, 1 (pp. 1169–1183).Denver, Co: ASPRS/AAG/URISA/AM-FM.
Wenderich, H. J. (1993). System selection based on data requirements. In J. Harts, H. F. L. Ottens, & H. J. Scholten (Ed.), Fourth European Conference and Exhibition on Geographical Information Systems (EGIS), 1 (pp. 410–419). Genoa, Italy: EGIS Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harvey, F. (1997). Improving multi-purpose GIS design: Participative design. In: Hirtle, S.C., Frank, A.U. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1329. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63623-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69616-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive