Advertisement

Embedding minimal knowledge into autoepistemic logic

  • Riccardo Rosati
Knowledge Representation 1
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1321)

Abstract

We investigate the epistemological properties of MKNF, Lifschitz's logic of minimal knowledge and negation as failure. In particular, we show that the expressive power of MKNF is equivalent to Moore's autoepistemic logic (AEL), by defining an embedding of MKNF into AEL and vice versa. We also prove that the negation as failure modality not of MKNF exactly corresponds to the negative introspection operator in AEL. The two previous results imply that MKNF's minimal knowledge modality K can be represented by means of negation as failure not, i.e. MKNF theories admit an equivalent representation in terms of unimodal theories using the not operator only. This in turn implies that negation as failure is “more expressive” than minimal knowledge.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Beringer & Schaub, 1993]
    A. Beringer and T. Schaub, 1993. Minimal belief and negation as failure: a feasible approach. In Proc. of AAAI-93, 400–405.Google Scholar
  2. [Bochman, 1995]
    A. Bochman, 1995. On bimodal nonmonotonic modal logics and their unimodal and nonmodal equivalents. In Proc. of IJCAI-95, 1518–1524.Google Scholar
  3. [Chen, 1994]
    Y. Chen, 1994. The logic of only knowing as a unified framework for non-monotonic reasoning. Fundamenta Informaticae, 21, 205–220.Google Scholar
  4. [Donini, Nardi, & Rosati, 1997]
    F. M. Donini, D. Nardi, and R. Rosati, 1997. Ground nonmonotonic modal logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 7(4). To appear.Google Scholar
  5. [Donini, Nardi, & Rosati, 1997b]
    F. M. Donini, D. Nardi, and R. Rosati, 1997b. Autoepistemic description logics. To appear in Proc. of IJCAI-97.Google Scholar
  6. [Gelfond & Lifschitz, 1988]
    M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In Logic Programming: Proc. of the fifth International Conference and Symposium, 1070–1080, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. [Gelfond et al., 1991]
    M. Gelfond, V. Lifschitz, H. Przymusinska, and M. Truszczyński, 1991. Disjunctive defaults. In Proc. of KR-91, 230–237.Google Scholar
  8. [Gottlob, 1995]
    G. Gottlob. Translating default logic into standard autoepistemic logic. Journal of ACM, 42:4:711–740, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [Halpern & 1985]
    J. Y. Halpern and Y. Moses. Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance: Preliminary report. Technical Report CD-TR 92/34, IBM, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. [Hughes & Cresswell, 1968]
    G. E. Hughes and M. J. Cresswell. An introduction to modal logic. Methuen, London, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. [Inoue & Sakama, 1994]
    K. Inoue and C. Sakama. On positive occurrences of negation as failure. In Proc. of KR-94, pages 293–304. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [Lifschitz, 1991]
    V. Lifschitz, 1991. Nonmonotonic databases and epistemic queries. In Proc. of IJCAI-91, 381–386, Sydney.Google Scholar
  13. [Lifschitz, 1994]
    V. Lifschitz, 1994. Minimal belief and negation as failure. AI Journal, 70:53–72.Google Scholar
  14. [Lifschitz & Schwarz, 1993]
    V. Lifschitz and G. Schwarz, 1993. Extended logic programs as autoepistemic theories. In Proc. of LPNMR-93, 101–114, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. [Lifschitz & Woo, 1992]
    V. Lifschitz and T. Woo, 1992. Answer sets in general nonmonotonic reasoning (preliminary report). In Proc. of KR-92, 603–614, Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  16. [Lin & Shoham, 1992]
    F. Lin and Y. Shoham, 1992. Epistemic semantics for fixedpoint non-monotonic logics. AI Journal, 57:271–289.Google Scholar
  17. [Marek & Truszczyński, 1993]
    W. Marek and M. Truszczyński, 1993. Nonmonotonic Logic — Context-Dependent Reasoning. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. [Moore, 1985]
    R. C. Moore, 1985. Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic. AI Journal, 25:75–94.Google Scholar
  19. [Rosati, 1996]
    R. Rosati, 1996. Minimal knowledge states in nonmonotonic modal logics. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Advances in Modal Logic (AiML96), CSLI, Stanford, USA.Google Scholar
  20. [Rosati, 1997]
    R. Rosati, 1997. Reasoning with minimal belief and negation as failure: algorithms and complexity. To appear in Proceedings of AAAI-97.Google Scholar
  21. [Schwarz, 1992]
    G. Schwarz, 1992. Minimal model semantics for nonmonotonic modal logics. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Logic in Computer Science (LICS-92), pages 34–43. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. [Schwarz & Truszczyński, 1994]
    G. Schwarz and M. Truszczyński, 1994. Minimal knowledge problem: a new approach. AI Journal, 67:113–141.Google Scholar
  23. [Schwarz, 1996]
    G. Schwarz. On embedding default logic into Moore's Autoepistemic Logic. AI Journal, 80:349:359, 1996.Google Scholar
  24. [Shoham, 1987]
    Y. Shoham. Nonmonotonic logics: Meaning and utility. In Proc. of IJCAI-87, pp. 388–392, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riccardo Rosati
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Informatica e SistemisticaUniversity di Roma “La Sapienza”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations