Texture analysis using pairwise interaction maps

  • Dmitry Chetverikov
Poster Session A: Color & Texture, Enhancement, Image Analysis & Pattern Recognition, Segmentation
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1310)


Pairwise pixel interactions have proved to be a powerful tool in feature based [3,7] as well model based [9] texture analysis. Different aspects and components of the feature based interaction map (FBIM) approach have already been discussed, but no self-contained description of the FBIM has been published yet. This paper provides a comprehensive up-to-date survey of the approach, including major algorithms and a series of experimental studies that demonstrate the capabilities of the approach.


Document Image Reflectional Symmetry Feature Base Approach Zone Classification Texture Anisotropy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    P. Brodatz. Textures: a photographic album for artists and designers. Dover, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Chetverikov. GLDH based analysis of texture anisotropy and symmetry: an experimental study. In Proc. International Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pages 444–448. Vold, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Chetverikov. Pattern orientation and texture symmetry. In Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, pages 222–229. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science vo1. 970, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Chetverikov. Structural filtering with texture feature based interaction maps: Fast algorithm and applications. In Proc. International Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pages 795–799. VOl.II, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Chetverikov. Texture feature based interaction maps: Potential and limits. In Proc. of Seminar on Theoretical Foundations of Computer Vision, Dagstuhl, Germany, 1997 (to appear). Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Chetverikov and K. Gede. Textures and structural defects. In International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Kiel, Germany, 1997 (to appear).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Chetverikov and R.M. Haralick. Texture anisotropy, symmetry, regularity: Re-covering structure from interaction maps. In Proc. British Machine Vision Conference, pages 57–66, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Chetverikov, J. Liang, J. Kómüves, and R.M. Haralick. Zone classification using texture features. In Proc. International Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pages 676–680. Vol.III, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Gimel'farb. Non-Markov Gibbs texture models with multiple pairwise pixel interactions. In Proc. International Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pages 591–595. Vol.II, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. M. Haralick and L. G. Shapiro. Computer and Robot Vision, volume I. Addison-Wesley, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitry Chetverikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer and Automation Research InstituteBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations