# Computing stochastic completion fields in linear-time using a resolution pyramid

## Abstract

We describe a linear-time algorithm for computing the likelihood that a completion joining two contour fragments passes through any given position and orientation in the image plane. Our algorithm is a resolution pyramid based method for solving a partial differential equation characterizing a distribution of short, smooth completion shapes. The PDE consists of a set of independent advection equations in (*x, y*) coupled in the *ϕ* dimension by the diffusion equation. A previously described algorithm used a first-order, explicit finite difference scheme implemented on a rectangular grid. This algorithm required *O*(*n*^{3}*m*) time for a grid of size *n x n* with *m* discrete orientations. Unfortunately, systematic error in solving the advection equations produced unwanted anisotropic smoothing in the (*x, y*) dimension. This resulted in visible artifacts in the completion fields. The amount of error and its dependence on B has been previously characterized. We observe that by careful addition of extra spatial smoothing, the error can be made totally isotropic. The combined effect of this error and of intrinsic smoothness due to diffusion in the *ϕ* dimension is that the solution becomes smoother with increasing time, i.e., the high spatial frequencies drop out. By increasing Δξ and Δ*t* on a regular schedule, and using a second-order, implicit scheme for the diffusion term, it is possible to solve the modified PDE in *O*(*n*^{2}*m*) time, i.e., time linear in the problem size. Using current hardware and for problems of typical size, this means that a solution which previously took one hour to compute can now be computed in about two minutes.

## Keywords

High Spatial Frequency Illusory Contour Subjective Contour Advection Equation Discrete Orientation## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, E., Neural Dynamics of Form Perception: Boundary Completion, Illusory Figures, and Neon Color Spreading,
*Psychological Review***92**, pp. 173–211, 1985.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 2.Guy, G. and G. Medioni, Inferring Global Perceptual Contours from Local Features,
*Intl. Journal of Computer Vision***20**, pp. 113–133, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Heitger, R. and von der Heydt, R., A Computational Model of Neural Contour Processing, Figure-ground and Illusory Contours,
*Proc. of 4th Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision*, Berlin, Germany, 1993.Google Scholar - 4.Horn, B.K.P., The Curve of Least Energy, MIT AI Lab Memo No. 612, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.Google Scholar
- 5.Mumford D., Elastica and Computer Vision,
*Algebraic Geometry and Its Applications*, Chandrajit Bajaj (ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.Google Scholar - 6.Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and W.T. Vetterling,
*Numerical Recipes in C*, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar - 7.Strang, G.
*Introduction to Applied Mathematics*, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar - 8.Ullman, S. Filling-In the Gaps: The Shape of Subjective Contours and a Model for their Generation,
*Biological Cybernetics***21**, pp. 1–6, 1976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 9.Williams, L.R., and D.W. Jacobs, Stochastic Completion Fields: A Neural Model of Illusory Contour Shape and Salience,
*Neural Computation***9**(4), pp. 837–858, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar - 10.Williams, L.R., and D.W. Jacobs, Local Parallel Computation of Stochastic Completion Fields,
*Neural Computation***9**(4), pp. 859–881, 1997.Google Scholar