Skip to main content

Schema integration with integrity constraints

  • Database Integration
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Databases (BNCOD 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1271))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the use and treatment of integrity constraints in the federated database design process. We consider different situations occurring frequently in the schema transformation and schema integration process. Based on that, general rules are given which describe the correct treatment of integrity constraints. Other proposed integration approaches do not consider integrity constraints at all or are restricted to special kinds of constraints. Therefore, our approach can be used to extend or complete existing integration methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S. B. Navathe. A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4):323–364, December 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Busse, P. Fankhauser, and E. J. Neuhold. Federated Schemata in ODMG. In J. Eder and L. A. Kalinichenko, editors, East/West Database Workshop, Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop, pages 356–379, Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Cooper and Z. Qin. A Graphical Data Modelling Program with Constraint Specification and Management. In P. M. D. Gray and R. J. Lucas, editors, Advanced Database Systems, Proc. 10th British National Conf. on Databases, BNCOD 10, pages 192–208, LNCS 618, Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. DeMichiel. Resolving Database Incompatibility: An Approach to Performing Relational Operations over Mismatched Domains. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1(4):485–493, December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Garcia-Solaco, M. Castellanos, and F. Saltor. A Semantic-Discriminated Approach to Integration in Federated Databases. In S. Laufmann, S. Spaccapietra, and T. Yokoi, editors, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'95) pages 19–31, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Kim, I. Choi, S. Gala, and M. Scheevel. On Resolving Schematic Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems. In W. Kim, editor, Modern Database Systems, pages 521–550, ACM Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Krishmamurthy, W. Litwin, and W. Kent. Interoperability of Heterogeneous Databases with Schematic Discrepancies. In Y. Kambayashi, M. Rusinkiewicz, and A. Sheth, editors, Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, pages 144–151, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Radeke and M. H. Scholl. Framework for Object Migration in Federated Database Systems. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Database Systems, IEEE Computer Science Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. P. Reddy, B. E. Prasad, and A. Gupta. Formulating Global Integrity Constraints during Derivation of Global Schema. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 16(3):241–268, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. P. Reddy, B. E. Prasad, P. G. Reddy, and A. Gupta. A Methodology for Integration of Heterogeneous Databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 6(6):920–933, December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Schmitt and S. Conrad. Restructuring Class Hierarchies for Schema Integration. In R. Topor and K. Tanaka, editors, Database Systems for Advanced Applications '97, Proc. 5th Int. Conf., DASFAA'97, Melbourne, Australia, April 1–4, 1997, pages 411–420, World Scientific Publishing, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Schmitt and G. Saake. Integration of Inheritance Trees as Part of View Generation for Database Federations. In B. Thalheim, editor, Conceptual Modelling — ER'96, Proc. 15th Int. Conf., pages 195–210, LNCS 1157, Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. P. Sheth and J. A. Larson. Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3):183–236, September 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent, and Y. Dupont. Model Independent Assertions for Integration of Heterogeneous Schemas. The VLDB Journal, 1(1):81–126, July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. W. W. Vermeer and P. M. G. Apers. The Role of Integrity Constraints in Database Interoperation. In T. M. Vijayaraman, A. P. Buchmann, C. Mohan, and N. L. Sarda, editors, Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'96), Bombay, India, pages 425–435, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, September 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Carol Small Paul Douglas Roger Johnson Peter King Nigel Martin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Conrad, S., Höding, M., Saake, G., Schmitt, I., Türker, C. (1997). Schema integration with integrity constraints. In: Small, C., Douglas, P., Johnson, R., King, P., Martin, N. (eds) Advances in Databases. BNCOD 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1271. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63263-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63263-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63263-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69254-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics