Advertisement

Only persistence makes nonmonotonicity monotonous

Extended abstract
  • Joeri Engelfriet
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1126)

Abstract

An important characteristic of many logics for artificial intelligence is that they are nonmonotonic. This means that adding a formula to the premises can destroy some of the consequences. There may exist formulae that can always be safely added to the premises without destroying any of the consequences: they respect monotonicity. We consider three preferential logics for which we analyze the class of formulae which respect monotonicity. For each of the three logics we show that this class is equal to the class of formulae preserved under going to more preferred models, and we provide syntactic characterizations of these classes.

Keywords

nonmonotonic reasoning monotonicity preferential logics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Be89]
    J.F.A.K. van Benthem, “Semantic parallels in natural language and computation”, in: H.D. Ebbinghaus et al. (eds.), Logic Colloquium, Granada 1987, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 331–375Google Scholar
  2. [CK73]
    C.C. Chang, H.J. Keisler, Model Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973Google Scholar
  3. [Da80]
    M. Davis, “The mathematics of non-monotonic reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980, pp. 73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [En95]
    J. Engelfriet, “Minimal Temporal Epistemic Logic”, Technical Report IR-388, Free University Amsterdam, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 1995. To appear in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.Google Scholar
  5. [Et88]
    D.W. Etherington, Reasoning with Incomplete Information, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., Los Altos, California, 1988Google Scholar
  6. [ET93]
    J. Engelfriet, J. Treur, “A temporal model theory for default logic”, in: M. Clarke, R. Kruse, S. Moral (eds.), Proc. 2nd European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, ECSQARU '93, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 747, Springer Verlag, 1993, pp. 91–96Google Scholar
  7. [ET94]
    J. Engelfriet, J. Treur, “Temporal theories of reasoning”, in: C. MacNish, D. Pearce, L.M. Pereira (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, JELIA '94, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 838, Springer Verlag, 1994, pp. 279–299. Also in: Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5 (2), 1995, pp. 239–261Google Scholar
  8. [ET96]
    J. Engelfriet, J. Treur, “Specification of nonmonotonic reasoning”, in: D.M. Gabbay, H.J. Ohlbach (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning, FAPR'96, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1085, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 111–125Google Scholar
  9. [HM84]
    J.Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, “Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance”, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning, AAAI, 1984, pp. 125–143Google Scholar
  10. [KLM90]
    S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, M. Magidor, “Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Preferential Models and Cumulative Logics”, Artificial Intelligence 44, 1990, pp. 167–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [Mc77]
    J. McCarthy, “Epistemological problems of artificial intelligence”, in: Proceedings Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1977, pp. 1038–1044Google Scholar
  12. [Mc80]
    J. McCarthy, “Circumscription — a form of non-monotonic reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980, pp. 27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [MH95]
    J.-J. Ch. Meyer, W. van der Hoek, Epistemic Logic for Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 41, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. [Re80a]
    R. Reiter, “A logic for default reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980, pp. 81–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [Re80b]
    R. Reiter, “Equality and domain closure in first-order data bases”, Journal of the ACM 27, 1980, pp. 235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [Sh87]
    Y. Shoham, “A semantical approach to nonmonotonic logics”, in: Proceedings 10th IJCAI, 1987, pp. 388–392Google Scholar
  17. [Sh88]
    Y. Shoham, Reasoning about Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joeri Engelfriet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceFree University AmsterdamHV AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations