Skip to main content

Learning the past tense of English verbs using inductive logic programming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Connectionist, Statistical and Symbolic Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing (IJCAI 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1040))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents results on using a new inductive logic programming method called Foidl to learn the past tense of English verbs. The past tense task has been widely studied in the context of the symbolic/connectionist debate. Previous papers have presented results using various neural-network and decision-tree learning methods. We have developed a technique for learning a special type of Prolog program called a first-order decision list, defined as an ordered list of clauses each ending in a cut. Foidl is based on Foil [19] but employs intensional background knowledge and avoids the need for explicit negative examples. It is particularly useful for problems that involve rules with specific exceptions, such as the past-tense task. We present results showing that Foidl learns a more accurate past-tense generator from significantly fewer examples than all previous methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Bergadano and D. Gunetti. An interactive system to learn functional logic programs. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1044–1049, Chambery, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Bergadano, D. Gunetti, and U. Trinchero. The difficulties of learning logic programs with cut. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:91–107, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. E. Califf. Learning the past tense of English verbs: An inductive logic programming approach. Unpublished project report, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Mike Cameron-Jones and J. Ross Quinlan. Efficient top-down induction of logic programs. SIGART Bulletin, 5(1):33–42, Jan 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Clark and T. Niblett. The CN2 induction algorithm. Machine Learning, 3:261–284, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.W. Cohen. Compiling prior knowledge into an explicit bias. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 102–110, Aberdeen, Scotland, July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. De Raedt and M. Bruynooghe. A theory of clausal discovery. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1058–1063, Chambery, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Lavrac and S. Dzeroski, editors. Inductive Logic Programming: Techniques and Applications. Ellis Horwood, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. X. Ling. Learning the past tense of English verbs: The symbolic pattern associator vs. connectionist models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:209–229, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. X. Ling, 1995. Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. X. Ling and M. Marinov. Answering the connectionist challenge: A symbolic model of learning the past tense of English verbs. Cognition, 49(3):235–290, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. B. MacWhinney and J. Leinbach. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb model. Cognition, 40:291–296, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. J. Mooney and M. E. Califf. Induction of first-order decision lists: Results on learning the past tense of English verbs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3:1–24, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Muggleton and C. Feng. Efficient induction of logic programs. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Tokyo, Japan, 1990. Ohmsha.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. H. Muggleton, editor. Inductive Logic Programming. Academic Press, New York, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Pazzani and D. Kibler. The utility of background knowledge in inductive learning. Machine Learning, 9:57–94, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Quinlan. Past tenses of verbs and first-order learning. In C. Zhang, J. Debenham, and D. Lukose, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 13–20, Singapore, 1994. World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. R. Quinlan and R. M. Cameron-Jones. FOIL: A midterm report. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3–20, Vienna, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.R. Quinlan. Learning logical definitions from relations. Machine Learning, 5(3):239–266, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. L. Richards and R. J. Mooney. Automated refinement of first-order Horn-clause domain theories. Machine Learning, 19(2):95–131, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. L. Rivest. Learning decision lists. Machine Learning, 2(3):229–246, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. E. Rumelhart and J. McClelland. On learning the past tense of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, editors, Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. II, pages 216–271. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. I. Webb and N. Brkic. Learning decision lists by prepending inferred rules. In Proceedings of the Australian Workshop on Machine Learning and Hybrid Systems, pages 6–10, Melbourne, Australia, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. David Yarowsky. Decision lists for lexical ambiguity resolution: Application to accent restoration in Spanish and French. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 88–95, Las Graces, NM, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. M. Zelle and R. J. Mooney. Combining top-down and bottom-up methods in inductive logic programming. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 343–351, New Brunswick, NJ, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stefan Wermter Ellen Riloff Gabriele Scheler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mooney, R.J., Califf, M.E. (1996). Learning the past tense of English verbs using inductive logic programming. In: Wermter, S., Riloff, E., Scheler, G. (eds) Connectionist, Statistical and Symbolic Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing. IJCAI 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1040. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60925-3_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60925-3_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60925-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49738-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics