The Fusion object-oriented method: an evaluation
This paper presents a critical evaluation, from a computer science point of view, of the Fusion method for object-oriented development and it sketches some guidelines for improvement. It focuses on three critical observations: (1) weakness of the ontology of the object model, (2) lack of formality, and (3) failure of the iterative process to construct comprehensive requirements and analysis models. A longer version of the paper  illustrates our observations with examples and develops our suggestions for improvement.
Keywordsobject-oriented software development analysis and design methods Fusion evaluation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. Coleman, P. Arnold, S. Bodoff, C. Dollin, H. Gilchrist, F. Hayes, and P. Jeremaes. Object-Oriented Development: The Fusion Method. Prentice Hall, 1994.Google Scholar
- 2.A. Hutt, editor. Object Analysis and Design — Description of Methods. J. Wiley, 1994. Document of the Object Management Group.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Pirotte, T. Van Den Berghe, and E. Zimányi. Problems and improvements of the Fusion Object-Oriented Method. Forthcoming, Sept. 1995.Google Scholar