Advertisement

A self-learning neuro-fuzzy system

  • Nicholas DeClaris
  • Mu-Chun Su
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 999)

Abstract

Often a major difficulty in the design of rule-based expert systems is the process of acquiring the requisite knowledge in the form of production rules. In most of expert systems, crisp or fuzzy if-then rules are generally derived from human experts using linguistic information. However, the initial linguistic rules are invariably rather crude and, although qualitatively correct, need to be refined to achieve better performance. In this paper, we present an innovative approach to the rule extraction directly from experimental numerical data for pattern recognition and system identification. This paper presents a neural network-based system which is trained in such a way that it provides an appealing solution to the problem of knowledge acquisition based on experimental numerical data. The values of the network's parameters, after sufficient training, are then utilized to generate both crisp and fuzzy if-then rules. The concept and method presented in this paper are illustrated through one traditional academic pattern recognition problem and one highly nonlinear system identification problem.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L.A. Zadeh,” Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp.338–353, 1965.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. C. Su, A Neural Network Approach to Knowledge Acquisition, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, August, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Takagi and I. Hayashi, ”NN-driven fuzzy reasoning”, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, vol.5, No3, PP. 191–212, May, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. X. Wang, Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control: Design and Stability Analysis, Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. T. Lin C. S. G. Lee, Neural network-based fuzzy logic control and decision system, ”IEEE Trans. Computers, vol.40, No.12, PP.1320–1336, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Kosko, Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine Intelligence, Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. K. Simpson, ”Fuzzy min-max neural networks-part 1: Classification,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 776–786, Sep. 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. DeClaris and M. C. Su, ”A novel class of neural networks with quadratic junctions, ”IEEE Int. Conf. on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, PP. 1557–1562, 1991 (Received the 1992 Franklin V. Taylor Award).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. DeClaris and M. C. Su, ”Introduction to the theory and application of neural networks with quadratic junctions, ”IEEE Int. Conf. on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, PP. 1320–1325, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Poggio and F. Girosi, ”Networks for approximation and learning,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol.78, No.9, PP.1481–1497, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. J. Cios and N. Liu, ”A machine learning method for generation of a neural architecture: a continuous ID3 algorithm,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 280–291, March 1992.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Lang and M. J. Witbrock, ”Learning to tell two spirals apart,” Proc. Connectionist Models summer school, pp. 52–59, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas DeClaris
    • 1
  • Mu-Chun Su
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Medicine and College of EngineeringUniversity of Maryland in Baltimore and College ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringTamkang UniversityTamsuiTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations