Skip to main content

Qualitative models as a basis for case indices

  • Methods and Tools
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 984))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Two issues are central to effective case-based reasoning: deriving good indices for retrieving cases and effectively using those cases. A number of straightforward methods for using cases, such as interpolation, can provide good results. However, effective indexing strategies have proven more elusive. This paper presents a new and effective approach based on qualitative modelling. We build a partial or complete qualitative model of a physical system, and use this model to derive the minimal sets of parameters relevant to each of the desired inputs. This reduces the number of attributes used for indexing, thereby increasing the density of cases in the parameter space. We present results showing the effectiveness of the approach on a simplified sewage treatment plant.

This work has been funded jointly by Swiss National Science Foundation grant #5003-034269 and by Nestle York RECO, England. Particular thanks to Prof. Boi Faltings (EPFL) and Mr. Peter Duxbury-Smith (Nestle) for their help and inspiration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. W. Aha, D. Kibler, and M. K. Albert: Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6 (1991) pp 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Cardie: Using decision trees to improve case-based learning. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning (1993) pp 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. H. Cover and P. E. Hart: Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13 (1967) pp 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Goodman: Results on controlling action with projective visualization. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1994) pp 1245–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. J. Parry and C. X. Ling: Deciding Weights for IBL Algorithms using C4.5. unpublished draft (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. R. Quinlan: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning 1 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Quinlan: Combining instance-based and model-based learning. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning (1993) pp 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ramachandran, R. Mooney, and B. Kuipers: Learning Qualitative Models for Systems with Multiple Operating Regions. Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems (1994) pp 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. L. Richards, I. Kraan, and B. Kuipers: Automatic abduction of qualitative models. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1992) pp 723–728.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. M. Veloso: Planning and Learning by Analogical Reasoning, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Paul Haton Mark Keane Michel Manago

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richards, B.L. (1995). Qualitative models as a basis for case indices. In: Haton, JP., Keane, M., Manago, M. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 984. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60364-6_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60364-6_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60364-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45052-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics