Skip to main content

Similarity-based consequence relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 946))

Abstract

This paper offers a preliminary investigation of consequence relations which make sense in a logic of graded similarity, and their application to interpolative reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dubois D., Lang J. and Prade H. (1994) Possibilistic logic. In: Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programing Vol. 3 (Gabbay D. et al., eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, 439–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. Prade H. (1992) Gradual inference rules in approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 61, 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. Prade H. (1995) Comparison of two fuzzy set-based logics: Similary logic and possibilistic logic. Proc. of the 4th IEEE Inter. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE'95), 1219–1226. Long version in Tech. Report IRIT/94-10-R, IRIT, Univ. P. Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Esteva F., Garcia P., Godo L. and Prade H. (1995). Similarity-based Consequences Relations. IIIA Research Report 95/1, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva F, Garcia P, Godo L. (1994a) Relating and extending semantical approaches to possibilistic reasoning. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 10, 311–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva F, Garcia P, Godo L. (1994b). On conditioning in Similarity Logic. Proc. IPMU'94 Conf., Paris, pp. 999–1005. Extended version to appear in Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, 1995, (B. Bouchon, R. Yager and L.A. Zadeh eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Fariñas del Cerro, A. Herzig (1991), A modal analysis of possibility theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol. 535, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, U.(1994), Monoidal logic, In Fuzzy Systems in Computer Science (R. Kruse et al., eds.), Vieweg, FRG, 233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Klawonn F. Kruse R. (1993) Equality relations as a basis for fuzzy control. Fuzzy Sets & Syst., 54, 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D.(1973) Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D. (1994) General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Vol. 3 (Gabbay D. et al., eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, 35–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillas E., Valverde Ll. (1984) On Implication and Indistinguishability in the setting of Fuzzy Logic. In Management Decission Support Systems using Fuzzy Set and Possibility Theory (R.R.Yager and J. Kacprzyk eds).Verlag TÜV, 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini E. (1991). On the semantics of fuzzy logic. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 5, 45–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1979) A theory of approximate reasoning. In Machine Intelligence, 9, Elsevier, New-York, 149–194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christine Froidevaux Jürg Kohlas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dubois, D., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L., Prade, H. (1995). Similarity-based consequence relations. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60112-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49438-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics