Skip to main content

Formal semantics of temporal epistemic reflection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation — Meta-Programming in Logic (META 1994, LOPSTR 1994)

Abstract

In this paper we show how a formal semantics can be given to reasoning processes in meta-level architectures that reason about (object level) knowledge states and changes of them. Especially the attention is focused on the upward and downward reflections in these architectures. Temporalized epistemic logic is used to specify meta-level reasoning processes and the outcomes of these.

This work is partially supported by ESPRIT III Basic Research Action 6156 (DRUMS II).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Doherty, NM3 — A Three-Valued Cumulative Non-Monotonic Formalism, in: Logics in AI, (J. van Eijck, ed.), LNCS 478, Springer, Berlin, 1991, pp. 196–211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Engelfriet, J. Treur, A Temporal Model Theory for Default Logic, in: M. Clarke, R. Kruse, S. Moral (eds.), Proc. ECSQARU '93, Springer Verlag, 1993, pp. 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Finger, D. Gabbay, Adding a temporal dimension to a logic system, Journal of Logic, Language and Computation 1 (1992), pp. 203–233.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.M. Gabbay, Intuitionistic basis for non-monotonic logic, In: G. Goos, J. Hartmanis (eds.), 6th Conference on Automated Deduction, LNCS 138, Springer Verlag, 1982, pp.260–273

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Giunchiglia, P. Traverso, F. Giunchiglia, Multi-Context Systems as a Specification Framework for Complex Reasoning Systems, in: J. Treur, Th. Wetter (eds.), Formal Specification of Complex Reasoning Systems, Ellis Horwood, 1993, pp. 45–72

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.Y. Halpern & Y.O. Moses, Towards a Theory of Knowledge and Ignorance, Proc. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, 1984, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. van der Hoek, J.-J. Ch. Meyer & J. Treur, Temporalizing Epistemic Default Logic. Techn. Report, Free University Amsterdam, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. van der Hoek, J.-J. Ch. Meyer & J. Treur, Formal Semantics of Temporal Epistemic Reflection. Techn. Report, Free University Amsterdam, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.-J.Ch. Meyer & W. van der Hoek, Non-Monotonic Reasoning by Monotonic Means, in: J. van Eijck (ed.), Logics in AI (Proc. JELIA '90), LNCS 478, Springer, 1991, pp. 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.-J.Ch. Meyer & W. van der Hoek, A Modal Logic for Nonmonotonic Reasoning, in: W. van der Hoek, J.-J. Ch. Meyer, Y.H. Tan & C. Witteveen (eds.), Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Partial Semantics, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992, pp. 37–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.-J. Ch. Meyer & W. van der Hoek, An Epistemic Logic for Defeasible Reasoning using a Meta-Level Architecture Metaphor. Techn. Report IR-329, Free University, Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.-J. Ch. Meyer & W. van der Hoek, A Default Logic Based on Epistemic States. in: M. Clarke, R. Kruse, S. Moral (eds.), Proc. ECSQARU '93, Springer Verlag, 1993, pp. 265–273. Full version to appear in Fundamenta Informatica.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.-J. Ch. Meyer & W. van der Hoek, Counterfactual reasoning by (means of) defaults in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 9 (III–IV), (1993), pp. 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.-J. Ch. Meyer & W. van der Hoek, Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.C. Moore, Semantical Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic, Artificial Intelligence 25, 1985, pp. 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Shoham, Reasoning about Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y.-H. Tan & J. Treur, A Bi-Modular Approach to Non-Monotonic Reasoning, in: Proc. WOCFAI'91 (M. DeGlas & D. Gabbay, eds.), Paris, 1991, pp. 461–475.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Treur, Modelling nonclassical reasoning patterns by interacting reasoning modules, Report IR-236, Free University Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Treur, Interaction types and chemistry of generic task models, in: B. Gaines, M. Linster (eds), Proc. EKAW'91, GMD Studien 211, 1992, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Treur, Towards dynamic and temporal semantics of meta-level architectures, Report IR-321, Free University Amsterdam, 1992. Also: Proc. META'94, 1994 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.W. Weyhrauch, Prolegomena to a Theory of Mechanized Formal Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence J. 13 (1980), pp. 133–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Laurent Fribourg Franco Turini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Hoek, W., Meyer, JJ., Treur, J. (1994). Formal semantics of temporal epistemic reflection. In: Fribourg, L., Turini, F. (eds) Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation — Meta-Programming in Logic. META LOPSTR 1994 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58792-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58792-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58792-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49104-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics