Advertisement

A formal software specification tool using the entity-relationship model

  • Naïma Nagui-Raïss
Case
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 881)

Abstract

Software engineering, like any other engineering field, needs to use formal methods to prove the reliability of its products and optimise their production and maintenance. In order to do that, software specification needs to be expressed in a language whose vocabulary, syntax and semantics are formally defined. These languages can be a federating formalism in information systems for data structures and dynamics. Formal specifications may then be automatically processed and software tools can be built to assist their development. Nevertheless, little effort has been devoted by research to tool support, yet such support is essential if specifications are to be used in industry. Within this perspective, we propose a support tool that uses tan extended Entity-Relationship model and a rule language as an interface for developing formal software specifications.

Keywords

CASE tools consistency proof ECA rules E/R model formal specification language formal software specification integrity constraints 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.R. Abria, ‘The specification language Z: Basic library', Oxford University. Programming Res. Group, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.R. Abrial, “The B method”, to be edited, 26, rue des plantes, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.R. Abrial, “The B notation”, A CNAM course Notes, Paris, January–June 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.L. Bauer, B. Möller, H. Partsch, P. Pepper, “Formal program construction by transformations — Computer Aided, Intuition Guided programming ”, IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng., Vol 15, No 2, Feb 1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.K.Berg, W.E.Boebert, W.R.Franta, T.G.Moher, “Formal methods of program verification and specification”, Prentice-Hall, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.Bouzeghoub, E.Metais, L.Leborgne, F.Hazi, “A Design Tool for Object Oriented Databases”, Proceed, of the 2nd Conference on Advanced Systems Engineering (CAISE90), Stockholm, Sweden, May 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.Bouzeghoub, E.Metais, “Semantic Modelling of Object Oriented Databases”, Proceed, of the Internat. Conf on Very Large Database (VLDB91), Barcelona Spain, Sept 1991.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.M.Chao, “A Rapid Prototyping Methodology for Conceptual Database Design Using the Executable Semantic Data Model”, Technical Report #90-03, Department of Computer Science, The university of Iowa, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.P. Chen, “The Entity-Relationship Model, Toward a Unified View of Data”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 1, No l, Mars 1976, pp. 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U. Dayal & al, “The HIP AC Project: Combining Active Databases and Timing Constraints ”, SIGMOD Record, Vol. 17, No.1, March 1988.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Futatsugi K., Goguen J.A., Jouannaud J., Meseguer J., 1985, ‘Principles of OBJ2', Proc. of the Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, 1985, ACM 52–66.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.A.Goguen,J. Meseguer & DPlaisted, ‘Programming with parameterized abstract objects in OBJ. Theory & Practice of Software Technology, Ferrari D., Bologuani M & J. Goguen, ed North-Holland, 1983, pp 163–193.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.V. Guttag, J.J. Horning, J.M. Wing, “The Larch Family of Specification Langages”, IEEE Soft., Vol 2, No 5, pp24–36, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayes. ‘Specification case studies', London, Prentice-Hall, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clones, ‘Software development: a rigorous approach', London, Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Jones.'Systematic software development using VDM', London, Prentice-hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Loucopoulos, C.Theodoulis, B.Wangler, “The Entity Relationship Time Model and the Conceptual Rule Language”, Proceeding of the 10th inter. Conf. on the Entity Relationship Approach, October 1991, California, pp. 181–204.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.M. Smith, D.C.P. Smith, “Database Abstractions: Aggregation and Generalization”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 2, No 2, June 1977, pp. 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naïma Nagui-Raïss
    • 1
  1. 1.PRiSM LaboratoryVersailles UniversityVersaillesFrance

Personalised recommendations