Recognizing credible experts in inaccurate databases

  • Hasan M. Jamil
  • Fereidoon Sadri
Communications Approximate Reasoning
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 869)


While the problem of incomplete data in databases has been extensively studied, a relatively unexplored form of uncertainty in databases, called inaccurate data, demands due attention. Inaccurate data results when data are contributed by various information agents with associated credibility. Though the data itself is total or complete, the reliability of the data now depends on the agents' credibility. Several issues of this form of data reliability has been reported recently where the credibility of agents were assumed to be known, static and uniform throughout the database. In this paper we address the issue of credibility maintenance of information agents and take the view that the agent credibility is dynamic and is a function of the database knowledge, the agent's performance relative to other agents, and the agent's expertise. We present a method to identify agents' field of expertise (called the contexts) and use agents' context dependent credibility to calculate the reliability of the contextual data.

Key words

approximate reasoning information agent contexts of data data reliability agent credibility inaccurate data uncertainty management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Cheng, Y.; “Context-Dependent Similarity”; Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6; Elsevier Science Publishers; 1991; pp 41–47.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Cochran, W. G.; “Sampling Techniques”; John Wiley & Sons, NY; 1977.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Jamil, H. M. and Sadri, F.; “Trusting an Information Agent”; In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Banff, Alberta; October, 1993; (Also to appear in Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Jamil, H. M. and Sadri, F.; “Recognizing Credible Experts in Inaccurate Databases”; Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal; July, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Krumhansl, C. L.; “Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data: the Interrelationship Between Similarity and Spatial Density”; Psychological Review, 85; 1978; pp 445–463.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Maier, D.; “The Theory of Relational Databases”; Computer Science Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sadri, F.; “Reliability of Answers to Queries in Relational Databases”; IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering; Vol 3, No 2, pp 245–251; 1991.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sadri, F.; “Modeling Uncertainty in Databases”; IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Engineering; pp 122–131; 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Sadri, F.; “Integrity Constraints in the Information Source Tracking Method.”; To appear in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shiri, N. and Jamil, H. M.; “Uncertainty as a Function of Expertise”; Proceedings of the Workshop on Incompleteness and Uncertainty in Information Systems, Montreal, Quebec; October, 1993; (Also to appear in Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hasan M. Jamil
    • 1
  • Fereidoon Sadri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations