Multimedia authoring systems for constructing education packages for Special Needs Education

  • J. Fowler
  • S. Swales
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 860)


There are many problems involved with using “off-the-shelf” educational packages in Special Needs Education. For instance, commercial packages have, in the past, been found to accomplish only about half the function requires, or are found not to meet the needs of the pupils at all. An additional problem, is that these pupils often require special hardware which caters for their individual needs. There seems to be a complete lack of software which can be configured for the use of these special devices, which would enable the individual pupils to use the various programs.

This paper contains details of proposed research, which is currently underway, looking into specifying, designing and developing a system, which would allow teaching staff at such Special Needs Schools to construct their own customised software for teaching purposes. With the use of such a system, software would be individually tailored to meet the needs of the pupils, and more accurately adjusted to the material being used in the curriculum of the time.

The proposed system would consist of a multi-media authoring system, which together with an easy-to-grasp user interface, would allow teachers to build their own stand-alone packages without the need to know a programming language.


  1. 1.
    Berg M.,’ Computerised system for special needs', Computer Education, p.30, Feb. 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey J.,’ Curriculum approaches in special education computing', Journal of Computer-based Instruction, p.1–5, Winter 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood D. L.,’ The Characteristics of intrinsically motivating early childhood and special education software', proc. IFIP TC 3 fifth world conference on Computers in Education, July 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hannafin R., Savenye W.,’ Technology in the classroom: The Teacher's new Role and Resistance to it', Educational Technology, p26–31, June 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drew D.,’ Why Don't all professors use computers?', Academic-Computing, p12–14, 58–60, Oct 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolehmainen P.,’ The Changes in Computer Anxiety in a required computer course', proc. European conf. on Educational Research, The Netherlands, June 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crowe B.,’ Computers in the Secondary Art Curriculum', Annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Lexington USA, Nov. 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    'Marketing Education Computer Curriculum. Final Report.', Pittsburgh Univ., School of Education, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pyzdrowski A., DeNardo A.,’ Creating a computer simulator package for a hypothetical computer architecture', proc. Ann. conf. Eastern Educational Research Assn., March 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCluskey C.,’ Interactive Video in the Classroom', proc. Nat. Staff Dev. Conf. Nat. council of States on Inservice education', Nov. 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motteram G.,’ Using Standard Authoring packages to teach effective reading skills', p. 15–21, System, V18 n1, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waterworth J.,’ Multimedia technology and application', Ellis Horwood 1991Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tway L.,’ Welcome To Multimedia', MIS Press 1992Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maybury. M. T.,’ Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces', American Association for Artificial Intelligence 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fowler J., Swales S.,’ Art Master — A Package For Special Needs Education (Paper)’ Proc. AETT 29th International Conference, Edinburgh 1994Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amiga Shopper Magazine, Future Publishing Ltd., Issue 37, May 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Fowler
    • 1
  • S. Swales
    • 1
  1. 1.School Of Computing And Information SystemsUniversity Of SunderlandSunderlandUK

Personalised recommendations