Using inductive machine learning, expert systems and case based reasoning to predict preterm delivery in pregnant women

  • M. Van Dyne
  • C. Tsatsoulis
  • J. Thorp
Medical Systems
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 856)


A previously constructed prototype expert system was extended to include case-based reasoning and learning, in order to improve the system's predictive accuracy in assessing preterm delivery risk. The initial expert system was developed by using an inductive machine learning technique on 9,445 data records of pregnant women, providing production rules to predict preterm delivery. Its predictive accuracy was tested on a separate set of 9,445 data records. Next, the capability to reason from both production rules and input test cases was added to the system, in addition to the capability to internally modify its confidence in each piece of knowledge (rule or case) and the relative importance of patient attributes which appear to be predictive of preterm delivery. The system was structured such that the accuracy of either type of reasoning could be measured individually to determine how rule-based and case-based reasoning perform alone, and to determine how they perform together. Results show that the predictive accuracy of the system was improved, with different trends emerging, dependent on the bias of the learning data, with the hybrid system providing the best predictive accuracy.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Grzymala-Busse, J. (1988). Knowledge acquisition under uncertainty — a rough set approach. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems. 3–16.Google Scholar
  2. Grzymala-Busse, J. (1989). An overview of the LERS1 learning system. in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems. Volume 2, 838–844.Google Scholar
  3. Grzymala-Busse, J. (1991). Managing Uncertainty in Expert Systems. Boston. Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. McLean, M., Walters, W., & Smith, R. (1993). Prediction and early diagnosis of preterm labor: a critical review. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 48 (4), 209–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. NIH (National Institutes of Health) (1992). Guide to Grants and Contracts. July.Google Scholar
  6. Riesbeck, C. & Schank, R. (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Hillsdale, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Schank, R. (1982). Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Van Dyne, M., Woolery, L., Grzymala-Busse, J. & Tsatsoulis, C. (1994). Using machine learning and expert systems to predict preterm delivery in pregnant women. in Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications '94. 344–350.Google Scholar
  9. Woolery, L., Van Dyne, M., Grzymala-Busse, J. & Tsatsoulis, C. (in press). Machine learning for development of an expert system to support assessment of preterm labor risk. Nursing Informatics '94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Van Dyne
    • 1
  • C. Tsatsoulis
    • 2
  • J. Thorp
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Center for Excellence in Computer-Aided Systems Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  3. 3.St. Luke's Perinatal CenterKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations