Strategic interaction in oligopolistic markets — experimenting with real and artificial agents

  • José Castro Caldas
  • Helder Coelho
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 830)


Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) concepts and ideas are used to model dynamic strategic interaction among producers in oligopolistic markets. Results of a laboratory experiment with human agents in the role of duopolists were used to design an architecture of artificial agents. A system in which these artificially intelligent agents interact as duopolists in a market environment was implemented and tested. The artificial agents exhibit some of the learning and adaptive capabilities observed in human subjects and the system is able to reproduce the overall pattern of interaction of the laboratory experiments. Results so far encourage us to think that the implementation of a computational test-bench for research in economic strategic interaction based in DAI techniques is possible and may contribute to theoretic progress in economics.


strategic interaction economic behavior test-bench for Experimental Economics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ARTHUR, W.B.“Learning and Adaptive Economic Behavior — Designing Economic Agents that Act Like Human Agents: a Behavioral Approach to Bounded Rationality”. The American Economic Review. Vol.81, n.2. 1991.Google Scholar
  2. CHAMBERLIN, E.. “ The Theory of Monopolistic Competition”. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1933.Google Scholar
  3. COELHO, H.; GASPAR, G.; RAMOS, I. “Experiments in Modelling Communication among Autonomous Agents”. Proceedings of I.F.I.P. WG 8.3 Working Conference on Decision Support Systems.Fontainebleu (France), 1–3 July 1992.Google Scholar
  4. CYERT, R.M.; MARCH J.G. “Processus de décision dans l'entreprise”. Dunod. Paris. 1970.Google Scholar
  5. FRIEDMAN, M. “Essays in Positive Economics”. University of Chicago Press. 1953.Google Scholar
  6. GASPAR, G. “Communication and Belief Changes in a Society of Agents”. Proceedings of the Fifth Rocky Mountain Conference on Pragmatics in A.I.,Las Cruces (U.S.A.), June 28–30, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. GASPAR, G.; COELHO, H. “A Modular Architecture for Agents Living in Society”. INESC Research Report. 1991.Google Scholar
  8. HOLLAND, J.H.; MILLER, J. H. “Artificial Adaptive Agents In Economic Theory”. The American Economic Review. Vol.81, n. 2. May 1991.Google Scholar
  9. MARIMON, R.; McGRATTAN E.; SARGENT, T.J.. “Money as a Medium of Exchange in an Economy With Artificially Intelligent Agents.”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. n. 14. pp. 329–373. 1990.Google Scholar
  10. MILLER, R. M.. “Markets as Logic Programs”. Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management. L. F. PAU (Editor). Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland). 1986a.Google Scholar
  11. MILLER, R. M. “On distributing the Intelligence of Economic Processes”. L'Èconomique et L'Intelligence Artificielle. Conference Internationale IFAC. Aug. 31–Sep. 4 1986b.Google Scholar
  12. MONTEIRO, J. C. “Model of a Society of Intelligent Systems” (in Portuguese). LNEC Report. 1989.Google Scholar
  13. PLOTT, C. R.. “Industrial Organization Theory and Experimental Science”. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 20. pp 1485–1527. 1982.Google Scholar
  14. SERNADAS, C.; COELHO, H.; GASPAR, G.. “Communicating Knowledge Systems: Big Talk among Small Systems”, Applied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, nos. 3–4, pp. 233–260 and 315–335. 1987.Google Scholar
  15. SMITH, V. L.; WILLIAMS, A. W.; BRATTON, W. K.; VANNONI, M. G.. “Competitive Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs. Sealed Bid-Offer Auctions”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 72. pp 58–77. 1982a.Google Scholar
  16. SMITH, V. L.. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 72. pp 923–955. 1982b.Google Scholar
  17. STAR, S. “Trader: A Knowledge-Based System for Trading in Markets”. L'Èconomique et L'Intelligence Artificielle. Conference Internationale IFAC. Aug. 31–Sep. 4 1986.Google Scholar
  18. TVERSKY, A.; KAHNEMAN D. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions” in HOGARTH, R.M., REDER, M. (ed.).“Rational Choice — The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology”. The University of Chicago Press. 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Castro Caldas
    • 1
  • Helder Coelho
    • 2
  1. 1.I.S.C.T.E.LisboaPortugal
  2. 2.I.S.E.G.LisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations