Advertisement

Gentzen sequent calculus for possibilistic reasoning

  • Churn Jung Liau
  • Bertrand I -Peng Lin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 808)

Abstract

Possibilistic logic is an important uncertainty reasoning mechanism based on Zadeh's possibility theory and classical logic. Its inference rules are derived from the classical resolution rule by attaching possibility or necessity weights to ordinary clauses. However, since not all possibility-valued formulae can be converted into equivalent possibilistic clauses, these inference rules are somewhat restricted. In this paper, we develop Gentzen sequent calculus for possibilistic reasoning to lift this restriction. This is done by first formulating possibilistic reasoning ⇒ a kind of modal logic. Then the Gentzen method for modal logics generalized to cover possibilistic logic. Finally, some properties of possibilistic logic, such as Craig's interpolation lemma and Beth's definability theorem are discussed in the context of Gentzen methods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beth, E. W.: “On Padoa's method in the theory of definition,” in: Indag. Math. 15 (1953) 330–339.Google Scholar
  2. Craig, W.: “Linear reasoning. A new form of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem,” in: Journal of Symbol Logic 22 (1957a) 250–268.Google Scholar
  3. Craig, W.: “Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory to proof theory,” in: Journal of Symbol Logic 22 (1957b) 269–285.Google Scholar
  4. Dubois, D., J. Lang, and H. Prade: “Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning. Part 2: Logical approache,” in: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 25th Anniversary volume, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Dubois, D., and H. Prade: “An introduction to possibilistic and fuzzy logics,” in: P. Smets et al. (eds.), Non-standard Logics for Automated Reasoning, Academic Press (1988) 287–325.Google Scholar
  6. Dubois, D., H. Prade, and C. Testmale: “In search of a modal system for possibility theory,” in: Proc. of ECAI-88 (1988) 501–506.Google Scholar
  7. Farinas del Cerro, L., and A. Herzig: “A modal analysis of possibility theory,” in: Kruse and Siegel (eds.), Proc. of ECSQAU. Springer Verlag, LNAI 548 (1991) 58–62.Google Scholar
  8. Fitting, M.C.: Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. Vol. 169 of Synthese Library, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. Gaifman, H.: “A theory of higher order probabilities,” in: J. Y. Halpern (ed.), Proceeding of 1st Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann, (1986) 275–292.Google Scholar
  10. Gentzen, G.: “Investigation into logical deduction,” in: M. E. Szabo (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen Amsterdam: North-Holland (1969) 68–131.Google Scholar
  11. Liau, C. J., and I. P. Lin: “Quantitative modal logic and possibilistic reasoning,” in: Proc. of ECAI 92, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. Robinson, J. A.: “A machine oriented logic based on the resolution principle,” in: JACM 12 (1965) 23–41.Google Scholar
  13. Wallen, L.: “Matrix proofs for modal logics,” in: Proc. of IJCAI (1987) 917–923.Google Scholar
  14. Zadeh, L. A.: “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” in: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1 (1978) 3–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Churn Jung Liau
    • 1
  • Bertrand I -Peng Lin
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Information ScienceAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations