Advertisement

Algebraic Coding 1993: Algebraic Coding pp 287-303 | Cite as

Decoding a bit more than the BCH bound

  • Josep Rifà Coma
Bounds for Codes
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 781)

Abstract

The concept and characterization of ε-best rational approximations (ε-BRA) are given in this paper. And, by using this concept, a decoding algorithm for some cyclic codes is presented.

The conventional algorithms (Berlekamp-Massey, Continued Fraction, Extended Euclidean, ...) allows us to correct up to eBCH≤d−1/2 errors where d is the designed minimum distance of the cyclic code. However our algorithm will be able to correct more than d−1/2 errors in case that the true distance δ be greater than d.

The Expurged Golay Code is a very good example of the algorithm presented which allows us to correct up to three errors. This code G(23,11) is 3-error correcting but, by using the conventional algorithms we can only correct up to two errors.

Keywords

Cyclic Codes Expurged Golay Code Continued Fraction Expansion Convergents ε-BRA Rational Approximations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Berl68]
    E.R.Berlekamp, Algebraic Coding Theory, McGraw-Hill, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. [BoJa90]
    P.Bours, J.C.M.Janssen, M. Van Asperdt, H.C.A.Van Tilborg, “Algebraic. Decoding Beyond e BCH of Some Binary Cyclic Codes, when e > e BCH, IEEE Trans., IT-36, pag. 214–222, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. [EgKo91]
    O.Egecioglu, Ç.K.Koç, J.Rifà, “ Fast computation of continued fractions”, Computer Math. Applic. vol 21, n. 2–3, pag. 167–169, 1991.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [Elia87]
    M.Elia, “Algebraic Decoding of the (23,12,7) Golay Code”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-33, n. 1, January 1987.Google Scholar
  5. [FeTz91]
    G.Feng, K.K.Tzeng, “Decoding Cyclic Codes up to Actual Minimum Distance Using Nonrecurrent Syndrome Dependence Relations”, IEEE Trans., IT-37, pag. 1716–1723, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. [LiWi86]
    J.H. van Lint, R.M.Wilson, “On the Minimum Distance of Cyclic Codes”, IEEE TRans. IT-32, pag. 23–41, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. [MaSl77]
    F.J.MacWilliams, N.J.A.Sloane. The Theory of Error-Correcting Code, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. [Mass69]
    J.L.Massey, “Shift-register synthesis and BCH decoding”, IEEE Trans., IT-15, pag. 122–127, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Pete68]
    W.W.Peterson, “Encoding and error-correction procedures for Bose-Chaudhuri codes”, IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, IT-6, pag. 459–470, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. [ReSc.78]
    I.S.Reed, R.A.Scholtz, “The fast decoding of Reed Solomon Codes using Fermat theoretic Transforms and Continued Fractions”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol IT.24 pag. 100–106, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. [Roos83]
    C. Roos, “A New Lower Bound for the Minimum Distance of a Cyclic Code”, IEEE Trans. IT-37, pag. 330–332, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. [Sugi75]
    Y.Sugiyama, M.Kasahara, S.Hirasawa, T.Namekawa, “ A method for solving key equation for decoding Goppa codes”, Inform. Contr., 21, pag. 87–99, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. [WeSc79]
    LL.R.Welch and R.A.Scholtz, “Continued Fractions and Berlekamp's Algorithm”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-25 No.1, pag. 19–27, 1979Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josep Rifà Coma
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. d'InformàticaUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations