Skip to main content

Efficient reorganization of binary search trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 778))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider the problem of maintaining a binary search tree that minimizes the average access cost with respect to randomly generated requests. We analyze scenarios, in which the accesses are generated according to a vector of probabilities, which is fixed but unknown.

In this paper we devise policies for modifying the tree structure dynamically, using rotations of accessed elements towards the root. Our aim is to produce good approximations of the optimal order of the tree, while minimizing the amount of rotations.

We first introduce the Move Once (mo) rule, under which the average access cost to the tree is shown to equal the average access cost under the commonly used Move to the Root (mtr), at each reference. The advantage of mo over other rules is that mo relocates each of the items in the tree at most once. Consequently, modifying the tree by the mo rule results in O(nlgn) rotations (with n the number of items) for any infinite sequence of accesses.

Then we propose to combine the mo with the usage of counters (accumulating the reference history for each item), that provide approximations of the reference probabilities. We show, that for any δ, α>0, this rule (which we call moucs) approaches the optimal cost to within a difference of δ with probability higher than 1−α, after a number of accesses, which is linear in n times 1/α times 1/δ 2.

Author supported in part by the Technion V.P.R. Fund — E. and J. Bishop Research Fund and by the Fund for the Promotion of Research at the Technion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Allen, I. Munro, “Self-Organizing Search Trees”, JACM 25, #4, 526–535 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.J. Atallah, S.R. Kosaraju, L.L. Larmore, G.L. Miller, S-H Teng, “Constructing Trees in Parallel”, In Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.J. Bayer, “Improved Bounds on the Costs of Optimal and Balanced Search Trees”, Tech. Memo. 69, Proj. MAC M.I.T. Cambridge MA 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bitner, “Heuristics that Dynamically Organize Data Structures”, SIAM J. Comput, 8,1, pp. 82–110, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Boneh, M.Hofri, “The Coupon-Collector Problem Revisited.” Purdue University, Department of Computer Science, CSD-TR-952, February 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications John Willey, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. L. Fredman, “Two Applications of a Probabilistic Search Technique: Sorting X+Y and Building Balanced Search Trees”, 7th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, Albuquerque 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Galperin, R. Rivest, “Scapegoat Trees”, In Proc. of the 4th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Austin, TX, January 25–27, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Guttler, K. Mehlhorn, W. Schneider, “Binary Search Trees: Average and Worst Case Behavior”, Jour. of Information Processing and Cybernetics, 16, 41–61, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hofri, H. Shachnai, “Self-Organizing Lists and Independent References — a Statistical Synergy”, Jour. of Alg., 12, 533–555, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hofri, H. Shachnai, “On the Optimality of Counter Scheme for Dynamic Linear Lists”, Inf. Process. Lett., 37, 175–179, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.C. Hu, K. C. Tan, “Least Upper Bound on the Cost of Optimum Binary Search Trees”, Acta Information, 1, 307–310, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.G. Kirkpatrick, T.M. Przytycka, “Parallel Construction of Binary Trees with Almost Optimal Weighted Path Length”, In Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.E. Knuth, “Optimum Binary Search Trees”, Acta Informatica 1, 11–25,1971.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol 3: Sorting and Searching Addison-Wesley, Reading MA 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. W. Lai, D. Wood, “Adaptive Heuristics for Binary Search Trees and Constant Linkage Cost”, In Proc. of the end ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 72–77, San Francisco, CA, January 28–30, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Mehlhorn, “Nearly Optimal Binary Search Trees”, Acta Informatica 5 287–295, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Mehlhorn, A. Tsakalidis, “Data. Structures”. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Algorithms and Complexity, Vol A, chapter 6, pp. 301–341, Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.D. Sleator, R.E. Tarjan, “Self-Adjusting Binary search Trees”, JACM 32, #3, 652–686 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.D. Sleator, R.E. Tarjan, “Amortized Efficiency of List Update and Paging Rules”, Commun. ACM 28,2, pp. 202–208, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

M. Bonuccelli P. Crescenzi R. Petreschi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hofri, M., Shachnai, H. (1994). Efficient reorganization of binary search trees. In: Bonuccelli, M., Crescenzi, P., Petreschi, R. (eds) Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 778. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57811-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57811-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57811-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48337-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics