Skip to main content

Tool integration in evolving information systems environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Management and Processing of Complex Data Structures (IS/KI 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 777))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Evolution is a fact of life in information systems. Not only systems evolve but also their development processes. IS environments must therefore be designed for accommodating and managing change. The management of process meta models in repositories is one important step; we show how process traceability models and process guidance models can be developed and related in a standard repository framework. In addition, the currently available tool integration along the presentation, data, and control perspectives have to be augmented for process integration. In our process-adaptable and interoperable tool concept, tool behavior is directly influenced by the process guidance model and automatically traced according to the traceability model. The approach is demonstrated with a prototype requirements engineering environment developed in ESPRIT project NATURE.

This work was supported in part by the Commission of the European Communities under ESPRIT Basic Research Project 6353 (NATURE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, S. Cluet, and T. Milo. Querying and updating the file. In Proc. of the 19th VLDB Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Bry, H. Decker, and R. Manthey. A uniform approach to constraint satisfaction and constraint satisfiability in deductive databases. In Proc. Intl. Conf. Extending Database Technology, Venice, Italy, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Chen and R.J. Norman. A framework for integrated CASE. IEEE Software, March 1992, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Conradi and M.L. Jaccheri. Customization and evolution of process models in EPOS. Proc. IFIP 8.1 Working Conf. Information Systems Development Process, Como, Italy, 1993, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Curtis. The CASE for processes. Proc. IFIP 8.2 Working Conf. The Impact of Computer-Supported Techniques on Information Systems Development, Minneapolis, Mn, 1992, 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Fernstroem, K.-H. Naerfelt, and L. Ohlsson. Software factory principles, architectures, experiments. IEEE Software, March 1992, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, L. Finkelstein, and M. Goedicke. View-points: A framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. Intl. Journal Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2(1), March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Gupta, I.S. Mumick, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Maintaining views incrementally. In ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Humphreys. Managing the Software Development Process, Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO/IEC 10027. Information Technology — Information Resource Dictionary Systtem (IRDS) — Framework. ISO/IEC International Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Jarke, (ed.). ConceptBase V3.1 user manual. Aachener Informatik Berichte Nr. 92-17, RWTH Aachen, Germany, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Jarke, K. Pohl, C. Rolland, J.-R. Schmitt. Experience-based method evaluation and improvement: A process modeling approach. submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Jarke, K. Pohl, S. Jacobs, J. Bubenko, P. Assenova, P. Holm, B. Wangler, C. Rolland, V. Plihon, J.-R. Schmitt, A. Sutcliffe, S. Jones, N. Maiden, D. Till, Y. Vassiliou, P. Constantopoulos, G. Spanoudakis. Requirements engineering: an integrated view of representation, process, and domain. Proc. 4th European Software Engineering Conf., Garmisch, Germany, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W.L. Johnson, M.S. Feather, and D.R. Harris. Representation and presentation of requirements knowledge. IEEE Transactions Software Engineering, 18(10):853–869, October 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Mi and W. Scacchi. Process integration for CASE environments. IEEE Software, March 1992, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Mylopoulos, A. Borgida, M. Jarke, and M. Koubarakis. Telos: representing knowledge about information systems. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 10(4):325–362, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Nagl. Eng integrierte Software Entwicklungsumgebungen. Ein Erfahrungsbericht ueber das IPSEN Projekt. Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung, 8(3), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. NIST. Reference Model for Frameworks of Software Engineering Environments. Draft Version 1.5, Nat'l Inst. Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Olive. Integrity constraints checking in deductive databases. In Proc. 17th VLDB Conf., Barcelona, Spain, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Pohl. The three dimensions of requirements engineering. Proc. 5th Intl. Conf. Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Paris, France, 1993, 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Pohl and M. Jarke. Quality information systems: support for evolving process models. Aachener Informatik Berichte 92-17, RWTH Aachen, Germany, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Ramesh and V. Dhar. Supporting systems development by capturing deliberations during requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, 18(6):418–510, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H.B. Reubenstein and R.C. Waters. The Requirements Apprentice: automated assistance for requirements acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(3):226–240, March 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.W. Sagawa. Repository manager technology. IBM Systems Journal, 29(2), 1990, 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.-R. Schmitt. Product modelling for requirements engineering process modelling. Proc. IFIP 8.1 Working Conf. on Information Systems Development Process, Como, Italy, 1993, 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Staudt, H.W. Nissen, and M.A. Jeusfeld. Query by class, rule and concept. Applied Intelligence, Special Issue on Knowledge Base Management, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L.A. Suchman. Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. Thomas and B.A. Nejmeh. Definitions of tool integration for environments. IEEE Software, March 1992, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. Urpi and A. Olive. A method for change computation in deductive databases. In Proc. of the 18th VLDB Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Wasserman. IDE: Tool integration in software engineering environments. Proc. SofTec-NRW Workshop CASE — Stand der industriellen Technik, RWTH Aachen, October 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Kai von Luck Heinz Marburger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jarke, M., Nissen, H.W., Pohl, K. (1994). Tool integration in evolving information systems environments. In: von Luck, K., Marburger, H. (eds) Management and Processing of Complex Data Structures. IS/KI 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 777. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57802-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57802-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57802-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48335-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics