Skip to main content

Economy of description for single-valued transducers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 94 (STACS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 775))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Questions of economy of description are investigated in connection with single-valued finite transducers. The following results are shown. (1) Any single-valued real-time transducer M with n states can be effectively transformed into an equivalent unambiguous real-time transducer having at most 2n states. (2) Let M be a single-valued real-time transducer with n states and output alphabet δ which is equivalent to some deterministic real-time or subsequential transducer M′. Then, M can be effectively transformed into such an M′ having at most \(1 + 2^n \cdot \max \left\{ {2,\# \Delta } \right\}^{2n^3 l}\) states where l is a local structural parameter of M. (3) For any single-valued real-time transducer M it is decidable in deterministic polynomial time whether or not it is equivalent to some deterministic real-time transducer (to some subsequential transducer, respectively). The results (1)–(3) can be extended to the case that M is not real time. The upper bound in (1) is at most one state off the optimal upper bound. Any improvement of the upper bound in (2) is greater or equal than 2n.

A part of this research was done while the first author was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Abrahamson, Succinct representation of regular sets using gotos and Boolean variables, J. Computer and System Sciences 34 (1987) 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Berstel, Transductions and Context-Free Languages, Teubner, Stuttgart, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Choffrut, Contribution à l'étude de quelques familles remarquables de fonctions rationnelles, thèse de doctorat d'état, Université Paris VII, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Choffrut and K. Culik II, Properties of finite and pushdown transducers, SIAM J. Computing 12 (1983) 300–315.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Choffrut and M.P. Schützenberger, Décomposition de fonctions rationnelles, Proc. 3rd STACS 1986, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 210, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986, pp. 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Eilenberg, Automata, Languages, and Machines, Volume A, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Gurari, An Introduction to the Theory of Computation, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Gurari and O. Ibarra, A note on finite-valued and finitely ambiguous transducers, Mathematical Systems Theory 16 (1983) 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Harju, H.C.M. Kleijn, and M. Latteux, Compositional representation of rational functions, RAIRO Informatique théorique et Applications 26 (1992) 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Harju, H.C.M. Kleijn, and M. Latteux, Deterministic sequential functions, Acta Informatica 29 (1992) 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Head and A. Weber, Deciding code related properties by means of finite transducers, in: Sequences II, (R. Capocelli, A. De Santis, and U. Vaccaro, eds.), Springer, New York, NY, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993, pp. 260–272.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hopcroft and J. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Kintala, K.-Y. Pun, and D. Wotschke, Concise representations of regular languages by degree and probabilistic finite automata, Mathematical Systems Theory 26 (1993) 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Kintala and D. Wotschke, Amounts of nondeterminism in finite automata, Acta Informatica 13 (1980) 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Leung, personal communication, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Leung, Separating exponentially ambiguous NFA from polynomially ambiguous NFA, Proc. 4th ISAAC 1993, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Lyndon and P. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, NY, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Meyer and M. Fischer, Economy of description by automata, grammars, and formal systems, Proc. 12th SWAT 1971, pp. 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.R. Moore, On the bounds for state-set size in the proofs of equivalence between deterministic, nondeterministic, and two-way finite automata, IEEE Transactions on Computers 20 (1971) 1211–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.-E. Pin, On reversible automata, Proc. 1st LATIN 1992, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 583, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 401–416.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Ravikumar and O. Ibarra, Relating the type of ambiguity of finite automata to the succinctness of their representation, SIAM J. Computing 18 (1989) 1263–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Reutenauer, Subsequential functions: characterizations, minimization, examples, Proc. 6th IMYCS 1990, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 464, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991, pp. 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E.M. Schmidt, Succinctness of descriptions of context-free, regular, and finite languages, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.P. Schützenberger, Sur les relations rationnelles entre monoÏdes libres, Theoretical Computer Science 3 (1976) 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Seidl, When is a functional tree transduction deterministic? Proc. 4th TAPSOFT 1993, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 668, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993, pp. 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Stearns and H. Hunt III, On the equivalence and containment problems for unambiguous regular expressions, regular grammars and finite automata, SIAM J. Computing 14 (1985) 598–611.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V.A. Uspensky, Complexity and entropy: an introduction to the theory of Kolmogorov complexity, in: Kolmogorov Complexity and Computational Complexity, (O. Watanabe, ed.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Weber, On the valuedness of finite transducers, Acta Informatica 27 (1990) 749–780.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Patrice Enjalbert Ernst W. Mayr Klaus W. Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weber, A., Klemm, R. (1994). Economy of description for single-valued transducers. In: Enjalbert, P., Mayr, E.W., Wagner, K.W. (eds) STACS 94. STACS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 775. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57785-8_175

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57785-8_175

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57785-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48332-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics