Process modelling and development practice

  • Tom Rodden
  • Val King
  • John Hughes
  • Ian Sommerville
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 772)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ambriola V, Montangero C. ‘OIKOS at the Age of Three’ in J.C.Derniame (Ed.): Software Process Technology: Second European Workshop, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-55928-0, pp 84–94Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandinelli S., Fuggetta A., Ghezzi C., Grigolli S. ‘Process Enactment in Spade', in J.C.Derniame (Ed.): Software Process Technology: Second European Workshop, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-55928-0, pp 67–98Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bansler J., Bodker K. ‘A Reapprraisel of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organisational Context', ACMTransactions on Information Systems, Vol 11 No 2, April 1993, pp 165–193Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broverman C., Huff K., Lesser V. ‘The role of plan recognition in the design of an intelligent user interface', Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Man, Machine and Cybernetics, pp836–868, 1986Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Cindio F., De Michelis G., et al ‘CHAOS as a Coordinating Technology', in proceedings of CSCW 86, Austin, Texas, December 1986Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellis C.A. ‘Information Control Nets: A mathematical Model of Office Information Systems’ Proceedings of the 1979 ACM Conference on Simulation, Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, August 1979, pp 225–239Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis C A., Nutt G. ‘Office Information Systems and Computer Science', ACM Computing Surveys, March 1980Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenwood M. ‘Using CSP and System Dynamics as Process Engineering Tools', in J.C.Derniame (Ed.): Software Process Technology: Second European Workshop, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-55928-0, pp 138–145Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaccheri L., Gai S. ‘Initial Requirements for E3: An environment for Experimenting and Evolving software processess’ in J.C.Derniame (Ed.): Software Process Technology: Second European Workshop, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-55928-0, pp 99–101Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreifelts T., Woetzel T. ‘Distribution and error handling in an office procedure system’ Proceedings IFIP WG 8.4 Working Conference on Office Systems Methods and Tools, Pisa, Italy, 1986, p 197–208Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krzanik L. ‘Enactable Models for Quantitive Evolutionary Software Processes’ proceedings of the 4th International Software Process Workshop, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol 14 No 4, June 1989, ACMPress, pp 103–111Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osterweil L. 'software Processes are software too’ in the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1987Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osterweil L.'Automated support for the enactment of rigourously described software processess’ proceedings of the 4th International Software Process Workshop, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol 14 No 4, June 1989, ACMPress, pp 122–126Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suchman, L. ‘Office procedures as practical action', ACMTransactions on Office Information Systems, Vol 1, 1983, pp 320–328Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Rodden
    • 1
  • Val King
    • 1
  • John Hughes
    • 1
  • Ian Sommerville
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Computing and SociologyLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations