Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Goal oriented vs. activity oriented process modelling and enactment: Issues and perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Software Process Technology (EWSPT 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 772))

Included in the following conference series:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbaoui, S., “PEACE: Un formalisme fondé sur une logique modale pour la modélisation des processus logiciels évolutifs et non-monotones”, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, France, July 1993 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arbaoui, S. and Oquendo, F., “Où en est la modélisation du processus de production du logiciel?”, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and its Applications, Toulouse, France, 1991 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arbaoui, S. and Oquendo, F., “The PEACE Project: Goal Oriented Approach and Nonmonotonic Process Modelling”, in Advances in Software Process Technology, Research Studies Press (J. Wiley) (book to appear in 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arbaoui, S. and Oquendo, F., “Managing Inconsistencies between Process Enactment and Process Performance States”, Proceedings of the 8th International Software Process Workshop (ISPW-8), Dagstuhl, Germany, March 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belkhatir, N., Estublier, J., Melo, W. L., “Software Process Model and Work Space Control in the Adele System” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process, Berlin, Germany, February, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deiters, W., Gruhn, V., “Managing Software Processes in the Environment MELMAC”, Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Development Environments, Irvine, California, December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dowson, M., “Consistency Maintenance in Process Sensitive Environments”, Proceedings of the Process Sensitive SEE Architectures Workshop, Boulder, September 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernstrom, C., “PROCESS WEAVER: Adding Process Support to UNIX”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process, Berlin, Germany, February, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heimbigner, D., “Proscription versus Prescription in Process-Centered Environments”, Proceedings of the 6th International Software Process Workshop, Hakodate, Japon, October 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huff, K. E., “Plan-Based Intelligent Assistance: An approach to supporting the software development process”, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts, September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser, G. E. and Feiler, P. H., “An architecture for intelligent assistance in software development”, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, Monterey, March 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katayama, T., “A Hierarchical and Functional Approach to Software Process Description”, Proceedings of the 4th International Software Process Workshop, ACM Software Engineering Notes. Vol. 14, No. 4, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Madhavji, N. H., et Gruhn, V., “PRISM = Methodology + Process-Oriented Environment”, Proceeding of 12th conference on Software Engineering, Nice, France, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oquendo, F., Zucker, J-D., Griffiths, Ph., “The MASP Approach to Software Process Description, Instantiation and Enaction”, Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Software Process Modelling, Milan, Italy, May 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, R. N., Belz, F. C., Clarke, L. A., Osterweill, L., Selby, R. W., Wileden, J. C., Wolf, A. L., Young, M., “Foundations for the Arcadia Environment Architecture”, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Software Engineering Symposium on Practical Software Development Environments, Boston, Massachusetts, November 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, I., “The Software Process as a Goal-directed Activity”, Proceedings of the 5th International Software Process Workshop, September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CRISS, Université Pierre Mendès France, B.P. 47, 38040, Grenoble Cédex 9, France

    Selma Arbaoui & Flavio Oquendo

Authors
  1. Selma Arbaoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Flavio Oquendo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Brian C. Warboys

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arbaoui, S., Oquendo, F. (1994). Goal oriented vs. activity oriented process modelling and enactment: Issues and perspectives. In: Warboys, B.C. (eds) Software Process Technology. EWSPT 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 772. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57739-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57739-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57739-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48326-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation