Skip to main content

Evolutionary learning for relaxation labeling processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 728))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Relaxation labeling processes are a class of parallel iterative procedures widely used in artificial intelligence and computer vision. Recently, a learning algorithm for relaxation labeling has been developed which involves minimizing a certain cost function with a gradient method. Despite the encouraging results obtained so far, the gradient algorithm suffers from some drawbacks that could prevent its application to practical problems. Essentially, these include the inability to escape from local minima and its computational complexity. In this paper we attempt to overcome the difficulties with the gradient procedure and propose the use of genetic algorithms for solving the learning problem of relaxation. Some results are reported which prove the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. M. Haralick and L. G. Shapiro (1979). The consistent labeling problem: Part I. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 1(2), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Charniak and D. McDermott (1985). Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Rosenfeld, R. A. Hummel and S. W. Zucker (1976). Scene labeling by relaxation operations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6(6), 420–433.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. S. Davis and A. Rosenfeld (1981). Cooperating processes for low-level vision: A survey. Artificial Intell. 17, 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Hummel and S. W. Zucker (1983). On the foundations of relaxation labeling processes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 5(3), 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Kittler and J. Illingworth (1985). Relaxation labeling algorithms — A review. Image Vision Comput. 3(4), 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. M. Haralick, J. L. Mohammed and S. W. Zucker (1980). Compatibilities and the fixed points of arithmetic relaxation processes. Comput. Graph. Image Processing 13, 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. P. O'Leary and S. Peleg (1983). Analysis of relaxation processes: The two-node two-label case. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 13(4), 618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Peleg and A. Rosenfeld (1978). Determining compatibility coefficients for curve enhancement relaxation processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 8(7), 548–555.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Pelillo and M. Refice (1992). An optimization algorithm for determining the compatibility coefficients of relaxation labeling processes. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, The Hague, The Netherlands, 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Pelillo and M. Refice (submitted). Learning compatibility coefficients for relaxation labeling processes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. W. Zucker, Y. G. Leclerc and J. L. Mohammed (1981). Continuous relaxation and local maxima selection: Conditions for equivalence. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 3(3), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Goldberg (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. H. Holland (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kullback (1959). Information Theory and Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lin (1991). Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 37(1), 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. P. Caudell and C. P. Dolan (1989). Parametric connectivity: Training of constrained networks using genetic algorithms. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, George Mason University, 370–374.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. W. Church (1989). A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics Speech Signal Processing, Glasgow, Scotland, 695–698.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Pelillo and M. Refice (1991). Syntactic category disambiguation through relaxation processes. Proc. EUROSPEECH 91, Genova, Italy, 757–760.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Pelillo, F. Abbattista and N. Abbattista (1993). Globally optimal learning for relaxation labeling by simulated annealing. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Image Anal. Processing, Bari, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pietro Torasso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pelillo, M., Abbattista, F., Maffione, A. (1993). Evolutionary learning for relaxation labeling processes. In: Torasso, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 728. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57292-9_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57292-9_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57292-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48038-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics