Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models

  • Barbara Tversky
Spatial Cognition
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 716)

Abstract

Although cognitive map is a popular metaphor for people's mental representations of environments, as it is typically conceived, it is often too restrictive. Two other metaphors for mental representations are proposed and supported. Cognitive collages are consistent with research demonstrating systematic errors in memory and judgment of environmental knowledge. Yet, for some simple or well-known environments, people seem to have coherent representations of the coarse spatial relations among elements. These spatial mental models allow inference and perspectivetaking but may not allow accurate metric judgments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Baird: Studies of the cognitive representation of spatial relations: I. Overview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, 90–91 (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Baird, A. Merril, J. Tannenbaum: Studies of the cognitive representations of spatial relations: II. A familiar environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, 92–98 (1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. W. Byrne: Memory for urban geography. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 31, 147–154 (1979)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. G. Chase: Spatial representations of taxi drivers. In: Dr. R. Rogers, J. A. Sloboda (eds.): Acquisition of symbolic skills. New York: Plenum 1983Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. G. Chase, M. T. H. Chi: Cognitive skill: Implications for spatial skill in large-scale environments. In: J. H. Harvey (ed.): Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1981Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. H. Clark: Space, time, semantics, and the child. In: T. E. Moore (ed.): Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press 1973, pp. 27–63Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Cohen, L. M. Baldwin, R. C. Sherman: Cognitive maps of a naturalistic setting. Child Development 49, 1216–1218 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Couclelis, R. G. Golledge, N. Gale, W. Tobler: Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology 7, 99–122 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. J. Fillmore: Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club 1975Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. A. Finke, R. N. Shepard: Visual functions of mental imagery. In: K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas (eds.): Handbook of perception and human performance. New York: Wiley 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. C. Hirtle, J. Jonides: Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition 13, 208–217 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. C. Hirtle, M. F. Mascolo: The effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12, 181–189 (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. C. Hirtle, M. F. Mascolo: The heuristics of spatial cognition. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, N: Erlbaum 1992, pp. 629–634Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. J. Holyoak, W. A. Mah: Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude. Cognitive Psychology 14, 328–352 (1982)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Jackendoff, B. Landau: Spatial language and spatial cognition. In: D. J. Napoli, J. A. Kegl (eds.), Bridges between psychology and linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1991), pp. 145–169Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. N. Johnson-Laird: Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1983Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. M. Kosslyn: Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1980Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. M. Kosslyn, H. L. Pick, G. R. Fariello: Cognitive maps in children and men. Child Development 45, 707–716 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Lakoff: Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1987Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. J. M. Levelt: Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1989Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Lloyd: Cognitive maps: Encoding and decoding information. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 79, 101–124 (1989)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Lloyd, C. Heivly: Systematic distortions in urban cognitive maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77, 191–207 (1987)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. H. Maki: Categorization and distance effects with spatial linear orders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7, 15–32 (1981)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. P. McNamara: Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 18, 87–121 (1986).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. P. McNamara, J. K. Hardy, S. C. Hirtle: Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 211–227 (1989)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Merril, J. Baird: Studies of the cognitive representations of spatial relations: III. A hypothetical environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, 99–106 (1979)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Milgram, D. Jodelet: Psychological maps of Paris. In: H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, L. G. Rivlin (eds.): Environmental psychology. Second Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1976, pp. 104–124Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. A. Miller, P. N. Johnson-Laird: Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1976Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    I. Moar, G. H. Bower: Inconsistency in spatial knowledge. Memory and Cognition 11, 107–113 (1983)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Newcombe, L. S. Liben: Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 34, 46–58 (1982)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Retz-Schmidt: Various view on spatial prepositions. AI Magazine 9, 95–105 (Summer 1988)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. K. Sadalla, W. J. Burroughs, L. J. Staplin: Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5, 516–528 (1980)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. K. Sadalla, S. G. Magel: The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior 12, 65–79 (1980)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. K. Sadalla, D. R. Montello: Remembering changes in direction. Environment and Behavior 21, 346–363 (1989)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    E. K. Sadalla, L. J. Staplin: The perception of traversed distance: Intersections. Environment and Behavior 12, 167–182 (1980)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Stevens, P. Coupe: Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 13, 422–437 (1978)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. A. Taylor, B. Tversky, Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition 20, 483–496 (1992)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    H. A. Taylor, B. Tversky: Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 261–282 (1992)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. A. Taylor, B. Tversky: Perspective in spatial descriptions (in preparation)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. W. Thorndyke: Distance estimation from cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology 13, 526–550 (1981)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    B. Tversky, Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology 13, 407–433 (1981)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    B. Tversky: Distortions in memory for visual displays. In: S. R. Ellis (ed.), M. K. Kaiser, A. Grunwald (assoc. eds.): Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments. London: Taylor and Francis 1991, pp. 61–75Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    B. Tversky: Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum 23, 131–138 (1992)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. N. Wilton: Knowledge of spatial relations: The specification of information used in making inferences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 133–146 (1979)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Tversky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations