The impact of scaling on a multimedia connection architecture

  • Eve M. Schooler
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 712)


As the last two meetings of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) have shown, Internet teleconferencing has arrived. Packet audio and video have now been multicast to approximately 170 different hosts in 10 countries, and for the November 1992 meeting the number of remote participants is likely to be substantially larger. Yet the network infrastructure to support wide scale packet teleconferencing is not in place.

This paper discusses the impact of scaling on our efforts to define a multimedia teleconferencing architecture. Three scaling dimensions of particular interest include: (i) very large numbers of participants per conference, (ii) many simultaneous teleconferences, and (iii) a widely dispersed user population. Here we present a strawman architecture and describe how conference-specific information is captured, then conveyed among end-systems. We provide a comparison of connection models and outline the tradeoffs and requirements that change as we travel along each dimension of scale.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Casner, S., Deering, S., “First IETF Internet Audiocast”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, Vol.22, No.3 (July 1992).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Schooler, E., “The Connection Control Protocol: Specification (vl.0)”, Technical Report, USC/ISI, Marina del Rey, CA (Jan 1992).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Schooler, E., “An Architecture for Multimedia Connection Management”, Proceedings 4th IEEE ComSoc International Workshop on Multimedia Communications (Apr 1992).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Arango, M., et al, “Touring Machine: A Software Platform for Distributed Multimedia Applications”, Proceedings 1992 IFIP International Conference on Upper Layer Protocols, Architectures and Applications, Vancouver, Canada (May 1992).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Vin, H.M., Zellweger, P.T., Swinehart, D.C., Rangan, P.V., “Multimedia Conferencing in the Etherphone Environment”, IEEE Computer, Vol.24, No.10 (Oct 1991).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Crowley, T., Milazzo, P., Baker, E., Forsdick, H., Tomlinson, R., “MMConf: An Infrastructure for Building Shared Multimedia Applications”, Proceedings CSCW '90, LA, CA (Oct 1990).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Chang, Y., Whaley, J., “Remote Conferencing Architecture”, IETF Teleconferencing Architecture BOF (July 1992).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Schulzrinne, H., “A Transport Protocol for Audio and Video Conferences and other Multiparticipant Real-Time Applications”, Working Draft (Oct 1992).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Partridge, C., “A Proposed Flow Specification”, RFC 1363 (Sept 1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eve M. Schooler
    • 1
  1. 1.USC/Information Sciences InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations