Approximation of the solution of the dendritic cable equation by a small series of coupled differential equations

  • Jaap Hoekstra
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 686)


In most literature on artificial neural network models the node (neuron) is represented as a point, learning rules are based on activity of other nodes and the activity of the node itself. Models incorporating local learning rules allows increase and decrease of weights on bases of activities of other nodes if the synapses are placed close together on the same dendrite. These models model the biological dendrite by solving an equivalent electrical circuit, consisting of several compartments. Current models solve the electrical circuit model by the numerical calculation of a recurrence relation in which the current of a compartment is expressed in the value of the current in a next compartment. In this way it is always necessary to model the whole dendrite, even if we are only interested in local effects. In this paper an alternative mathematical description is proposed on bases of which local activities can be calculated by only simulating a part of the dendrite model.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Methods in Neuronal Modeling, C. Koch and I. Segev (Eds.), Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp 63–97, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.L. Alkon, ‘Memory Storage and Neural Systems', In: Scientific American, July 1989.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.J.B. Jack, D. Noble, R.W. Tsien, Electric-current flow in excitable cells, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A.J. Klaassen and A. Dev,’ Learning pulse coded spatio-temporal neurons with a local learning rule', In: IJCNN, Vol. 1, Seattle, WA, pp 829–837, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A.J. Klaassen,’ Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for Compartmentally Modeled Unbranched Neurons', In: Artificial Neural Networks 2, I. Aleksander and J. Taylor (Eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ., pp 367–371, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A.J. Klaassen,’ Computing with Cables: Towards massively parallel neurocomputers', PhD-thesis Delft University of Technology, 1992, Delft: Delft University Press, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M.V. Mascagni,’ Numerical Methods for Neuronal Modeling', In: Methods in Neuronal Modeling, C. Koch and I. Segev (Eds.), Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp 439–484, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I.S. Segev, J.W. Fleshman, and R.E. Burke,’ Compartmental Models of Complex Neurons', In: Methods in Neuronal Modeling, C. Koch and I. Segev (Eds.), Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp 63–97, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M.A. Wilson, U.S. Bhalla, J.D. Uhley, J.M. Bower,’ GENESIS: A System for Simulating Neural Networks', In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, D.S. Touretzky (Ed.), Palo Alto: Morgan Kaufmann Publ., pp 485–492, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaap Hoekstra
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. Electrical EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyGA DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations