Skip to main content

Legality in inheritance networks

  • Non Monotonic Reasoning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IPMU '92—Advanced Methods in Artificial Intelligence (IPMU 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 682))

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we are interested in inheritance networks called “legal” inspired by [4], especially by the problem of maintaining network's legality during an update in order to operate on a possible ambiguity. The ambiguity known as “Nixon Diamond” [14] is resolved on inserting an exception link that inhibits the inference on one path. But as there exists many possibilities to add exception link we ask the user to settle the question. After an update the network's legality is maintened on taking out the “responsable ancestrally” cycles of the ambiguities. These cycles are called aac's (ancestor ambiguous cycles). The ambiguity's resolution at level of an aac entails the systematic resolution of ambiguous cycles having aac as ancestor. The number of aac allows to answer the question “what is the number of exception links to add to the network (or number of questions to ask to the user) in order to keep it in a legal state”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Berge: Graphes et hypergraphes. Dunod. Paris, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Coupey: Etude d'un réseau sémantique avec gestion des exceptions. Interprétation logique et implantation informatique. Thèse de Docteur d'Université, LIPN, Université Paris Nord, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.W. Etherington, R. Reiter: On inheritance hierarchies with exceptions. Proceedings of AAAI 83, Washington, DC 1983, pp 104–108.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.E. Fahlman, D.S. Touretzky, W.V. Roggen: Cancellation in a parallel semantic network. Proceedings of IJCAI, 24–28 August 81, pp 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Froidevaux, D. Kayser: Inheritance in semantic networks and in default logic. In: P. Smets et al. (eds), Non standard logics for automated reasoning, Academic Press, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Grégoire: Logiques non monotones. Programmes logiques stratifiés et théories sceptiques de l'héritage. Thèse de doctorat en sciences appliquées. Université Catholique de Louvain, Juin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Grégoire: Skeptical inheritance can be more expressive. Proc. 9th ECAI, August 90, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.F. Horty, R.H. Thomason, D.S. Touretzky: A skeptical theory of inheritance in non monotonic semantic networks. Proceedings of AAAI 87, pp 358–363.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.F. Horty, R.H. Thomason: Mixing strict and defeasible inheritance. Proceedings of AAAI 88, volume 2, pp 427–432.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.F. Horty, R.H. Thomason, D.S. Touretzky: A skeptical theory of inheritance in non monotonic semantic networks. A.I., volume 42, number 2–3, March 90, pp 311–348.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel Kayser: Cours de DEA. LIPN. Université Paris 13. Villetaneuse.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nacéra Madani: Héritage dans les réseaux légaux. paper submitted to le J.F.J.C, Rennes 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Moinard: Donner la préférence au défaut le plus spécifique. Actes 6ème congrés AFCET Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle, Antibes, 1987, pp 1123–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Reiter, G. Criscuolo: On interacting defaults. Proc. IJCAI 81, pp 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.S. Touretzky, J.F. Horty, R.H. Thomason: A clash of intuitions: the current state of non monotonic multiple inheritance systems. Proceedings of AAAI 87, pp 476–482.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier Llorenç Valverde Ronald R. Yager

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Madani, N. (1993). Legality in inheritance networks. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Valverde, L., Yager, R.R. (eds) IPMU '92—Advanced Methods in Artificial Intelligence. IPMU 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56735-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47643-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics