Abstract
This paper describes the basic framework and the latest configuration of a knowledge acquisition system named KAISER. This system inductively learns classification knowledge in the form of a decision tree, and analyzes the results and the processes with domain and task specific knowledge to detect improper states. Then it asks suggestive questions to eliminate the improprieties and acquires new domain knowledge for the next induction cycle. One of the final objectives of this research is to frame a unified theory in the classification trees' paradigm arguing: (1) what means to have a good/bad tree; (2) why it is good/bad; and (3) how to obtain a better one. To achieve this goal, KAISER has been enhanced with a meta-leamer named Meta-KAISER to accumulate the meta-knowledge by keeping track of the experts' response of domain level interaction.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. B. Kruskal: Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Non-metric Hypothesis. Psychometrika 29, 1964
O. Kakusho and R. Mizoguchi: A New Algorithm for Non-Linear Mapping with Applications to Dimension and Cluster Analyses. Pattern Recognition 1, 1983
J. R. Quinlan: Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning 1, 1986
C. J. Matheus and L. A. Rendell: Constructive Induction On Decision Trees. Proc. of IJCAI'89, 1989
P. B. Brazdil and L. Torgo: Knowledge Acquisition via Knowledge Integration. Current Trends in Knowledge Acquisition, B. Wielinga, J. Boose et al. (Eds.), 1990
G. Pagallo and D. Haussler: Boolean Feature Discovery in Empirical Learning. Machine Learning 5, 1990
M. J. Pazzani and D. Kibler: The Utility of Knowledge in Inductive Learning. UCI Tech. Rep., TR-90-18, 1990
K. Tsujino, M. Takegaki and S. Nishida: A Knowledge Acquisition System That Aims as Integrating Inductive Learning and Explanation-based Reasoning. Proc. of JKAW'90, 1990
M. J. Pazzani and C. A. Brunk: Detecting and Correcting Errors in Rule-Based Expert Systems: An Integration of Empirical and Explanation-based Learning. Knowledge Acquisition 3, 1991
C. J. Matheus: The Need for Constructive Induction. Proc. of ML'91, 1991
K. Tsujino and S. Nishida: A Knowledge Acquisition System driven by Inductive Learning and Deductive Explanation: KAISER. (In Japanese.) Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 7, 1992
V. G. Dabija, K. Tsujino and S. Nishida: Theory Formation in the Decision Trees Domain. (In English.) Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 7, 1992
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsujino, K., Dabija, V.G., Nishida, S. (1992). Knowledge acquisition driven by constructive and interactive induction. In: Wetter, T., Althoff, KD., Boose, J., Gaines, B.R., Linster, M., Schmalhofer, F. (eds) Current Developments in Knowledge Acquisition — EKAW '92. EKAW 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 599. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55546-3_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55546-3_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55546-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47203-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive