Fusion through interpretation
We discuss two problems in the context of building environment models from multiple range images. The first problem is how to find the correspondences between surfaces viewed in images and surfaces stored in the environment model. The second problem is how to fuse descriptions of different parts of the same surface patch. One conclusion quickly reached is that in order to solve the image-model correspondence problem in a reasonable time the environment model must be divided into parts.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.N. Ayache and O.D. Faugeras. Maintaining representations of the environment of a mobile robot. In Robotics Research 4, pages 337–350. MIT Press, USA, 1988.Google Scholar
- 2.Y. Bar-Shalom and T.E. Fortmann. Tracking and Data Association. Academic Press, UK, 1988.Google Scholar
- 3.T.J. Fan, G. Medioni, and R. Nevatia. Recognzing 3-d objects using surface descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(11):1140–1157, 1989.Google Scholar
- 4.O.D. Faugeras and M. Hebert. The representation, recognition, and locating of 3d shapes from range data. International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(3):27–52, 1986.Google Scholar
- 5.W.E.L. Grimson. Object Recognition by Computer: the Role of Geometric Constraints. MIT Press, USA, 1990.Google Scholar
- 6.R.A. Horn and C.R. Johnson. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, USA, 1985.Google Scholar
- 7.M.J.L. Orr, R.B. Fisher, and J. Hallam. Uncertain reasoning: Intervals versus probabilities. In British Machine Vision Conference, pages 351–354. Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
- 8.M.J.L. Orr, J. Hallam, and R.B. Fisher. Fusion through interpretation. Research Paper 572, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University, 1992.Google Scholar
- 9.J. Porril. Fitting ellipses and predicting confidence using a bias corrected Kalman Filter. Image and Vision Computing, 8(1):37–41, 1990.Google Scholar
- 10.Z. Zhang and O.D. Faugeras. Determining motion from 3d line segment matches: a comparative study. Image and Vision Computing, 9(1):10–19, 1991.Google Scholar