Skip to main content

Controlling content realization with functional unification grammars

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 587))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Standard Functional Unification Grammars (FUGs) provide a structurally guided top-down control regime for sentence generation. When using FUGs to perform content realization as a whole, including lexical choice, this regime is no longer appropriate for two reasons: (1) the unification of non-lexicalized semantic input with an integrated lexico-grammar requires mapping “floating” semantic elements which can trigger extensive backtracking and (2) lexical choice requires accessing external constraint sources on demand to preserve the modularity between conceptual and linguistic knowledge.

We introduce two control tools that we have implemented for FUGs to address these limitations: bk-class, a form of dependency-directed backtracking to efficiently process “floating” constraints and external, a co-routine mechanism allowing a FUG to cooperate with external constraint sources during unification. We show how these tools complement the top-down regime of FUGs to control the whole content realization process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • D. Appelt. Planning Natural Language Utterances. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cumming. The lexicon in text generation. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Automating the Lexicon, Pisa, Italy, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dale. Generating referring expressions in a domain of objects and processes. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. de Kleer, J. Doyle, G.L. Steele, and G.J. Sussman. Explicit control of reasoning. In Winston P.J. and R.H. Brown, editors, Artificial Intelligence: an MIT Perspective, pages 93–116. MIT Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Elhadad. Types in functional unification grammars. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Detroit, MI, 1990. ACL.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Elhadad. FUF: The universal unifier — user manual, version 5.0. Technical Report CUCS-038-91, Columbia University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Elhadad. Generating adjectives to express the speaker's argumentative intent. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Elhadad. Generating coherent argumentative paragraphs. Submitted to COLING'92, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Elhadad. Using argumentation to control lexical choice: A functional unification-based approach. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Columbia University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A.K. Halliday. System and function in language. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Hovy. Generating natural language under pragmatic constraints. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kay. Functional grammar. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kittredge and J. Lehrberger. Sublanguages: studies of language in restricted semantic domains. Walter DeGruyter, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.C. Mann. An overview of the PENMAN text generation system. Technical Report ISI/RR-83-114, ISI, Marina del Rey, CA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.C. Mann and C.M. Matthiessen. Nigel: a systemic grammar for text generation. Technical Report ISI/RR-83-105, USC/ISI, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Matthiessen. Lexicogrammatical choice in text generation. In C. Paris, W. Swartout, and W.C. Mann, editors, Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. R. McKeown. Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. R. McKeown, M. Elhadad, Y. Fukumoto, J.G. Lim, C. Lombardi, J. Robin, and F.A. Smadja. Text generation in comet. In R. Dale, C.S. Mellish, and M. Zock, editors, Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Academic Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Naish. Negation and Control in Prolog, volume 238 of Lectures Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Nirenburg and I. Nirenbrug. A framework for lexical selection natural language generation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. COLING, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. L. Paris. The use of explicit user models in text generation: tailoring to a user's level of expertise. PhD thesis, Columbia University, 1987. Also available as technical report CUCS-309-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Robin. Lexical choice in natural language generation. Technical Report CUCS-040-90, Columbia University, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Robin. A revision-based architecture for reporting facts in their historical context. To appear in Horacek H. and M. Zock, editors, Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Language Generation, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shieber. An introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar, volume 4 of CSLI Lecture Notes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Smadja. Microcoding the lexicon with co-occurrence knowledge. In Uri Zernik, editor, Lexical Acquisition: Using on-line resources to build a lexicon. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Smadja. Retrieving Collocational Knowledge from Textual Corpora. An Application: Language Generation.PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Columbia University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Shieber, G. Van Noord, R.M. Moore, and Pereira, F.C.P. A semantic head-driven generation algorithm for unification-based formalisms. In Proceedings of the 27th ACL, pages 7–17, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1989. ACL.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Talmy. Semantic causative types. in M. Shibatani, editor, The grammar of causative constructions, volume 6 of Syntax and semantics. Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Talmy. How language structures space. In Pick, H.L. and L.P. Acredolo, editors, Spatial orientation: theory, research and application, Plenum Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Talmy. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In T. Shopen, editor, Grammatical categories and the lexicon, volume 3 of Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

R. Dale E. Hovy D. Rösner O. Stock

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elhadad, M., Robin, J. (1992). Controlling content realization with functional unification grammars. In: Dale, R., Hovy, E., Rösner, D., Stock, O. (eds) Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. IWNLG 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 587. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55399-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55399-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55399-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47054-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics