Advertisement

Complementarity and non-locality in complex systems

  • Walter v. Lucadou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 565)

Abstract

Many of the early founders of quantum theory expected to find “quantum-like” features also within the domain of living systems. But these ideas have not found much support in biology or psychology until now. However, modern system theory dealing with complex self-referential systems might cast a new light upon this question. Since quantum mechanical observables cannot be applied directly to complex systems, a categorical analysis of those systems is necessary. After discussing some general features of quantum theory a phenomenological non-classical model to describe highly complex systems in developed.

It is argued that structure and function can be seen as complementary categories of complex systems which lead to the formulation of uncertainty relations. Furthermore non-locality is regarded as a crucial criterion for the underlying non-classical structure of complex systems.

The outcome of a psychological experiment is reported which is suggestive of non-local correlations within man-machine interaction. The results of this experiment support the model that a self-referential complex system may be able to select certain noise fluctuations from a causally separated system via non-local correlations if a feedback-loop generates an “organizational closure” of the “observer” and the “observed”.

The results further suggest that these constraints can be adequately described by the concept of “pragmatic information” which was proposed by von Weizsäcker to “measure” the “meaning” of a given information.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., Roger, G. (1982). Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 25, 1804.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, J.S. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Review of Modern Physics, 38, 447.Google Scholar
  3. Büchel, W. (1975). Naturphilosophische überlegungen zum Leib-Seele-Problem. Philosophia Naturalis, 15, 308–343.Google Scholar
  4. Bünning, E. (1943). Quantenmechanik und Biologie. Naturwissenschaften 31, 194–197.Google Scholar
  5. Clausner, J.F., Shimony, A. (1978). Bell's theorem: experimental tests and implications. Reports on Progress in Physics, 41, 1881–1927.Google Scholar
  6. Clough, S. (1988). The wrong side of the quantum tracks. New Scientist, 117 (No. 1605) 24 March: 37–40.Google Scholar
  7. Devereux, G. (1972). Ethnopsychoanalyse. Die komplementaristische Methode in den Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1984Google Scholar
  8. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47; 777–780.Google Scholar
  9. Fahrenberg, J. (1979). Das Komplementaritätsprinzip in der psychophysiologischen Forschung und psychosomatischen Medizin. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie 27: 151–167.Google Scholar
  10. Fahrenberg, J., Selg, H., Hampel, R. (1978). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI. Göttingen: Hogrefe (3.Aufl.)Google Scholar
  11. Finkelstein, D., Finkelstein, S.R. (1983). Computational Complementarity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 22, (8), 753–779.Google Scholar
  12. Geert, P.van (1989). Growth, Non-Linearity, and the Limits of Prediction. Paper presented at the ESSCS, 7th Workshop, Saint-Maximin-La-Sainte-Baume, Provence, France, June 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Gernert, G. (1985). Measurement of pragmatic information. Cognitive Systems, 1, (3), 169–176.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, J., Kim, C., McElroy, B., Shimony, A. (1977). Wave-Packet Reduction as a Medium of Communication. Foundation of Physics, 7, 759–767.Google Scholar
  15. Heisenberg, W. (1976). Was ist ein Elementarteilchen? Naturwissenschaften, 63, 1–7.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, O.W. (1986). Further Implications of Anomalous Observations for Scientific Psychology. American Psychologist, 1170–1172.Google Scholar
  17. Jahn, R.G. (1981). The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 70, (2), 136–170.Google Scholar
  18. Jahn, R.G., Dunne, B.J. (1986). On the Quantum Mechanics of Consciousness, with Application to Anomalous Phenomena. Foundations of Physics, 16, (8), 721–772.Google Scholar
  19. Jahn, R.G., Dunne, B.J. (1987). Margins of Reality. The Role of Consciousness in the Physical World. San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  20. Jahnke, W., Debus, G. (1978). Die Eigenschaftswörterliste EWL. Eine mehrdimensionale Methode zur Beschreibung von Aspekten des Befindens. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  21. Jammer, M. (1874). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York, London, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  22. Jordan, P. (1947). Verdrängung und Komplementarität. Hamburg: Storm.Google Scholar
  23. Kawamoto, H. (1987). Macroscopic quantum tunneling in SQUID. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics Supplement, 26, suppl. 26-3, pt. 2, 1389–1390.Google Scholar
  24. Kornwachs, K. (1987). Cognition and complementarity. In: Carvallo, M.E. (ed.): Nature, Cognition and Systems I. (pp. 95–127). Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  25. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1975). Beitrag zum Begriff der Komplexität. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Geisteswissenschaft, 16, 51–60.Google Scholar
  26. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1976). Beschreibung und Entscheidbarkeit. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Geisteswissenschaft, 17, 79–86.Google Scholar
  27. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1978). Funktionelle Komplexität und Lernprozesse. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Geisteswissenschaft, 19, 1–10.Google Scholar
  28. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1982). Pragmatic Information and Nonclassical Systems. In R. Trappl (ed.), Cybernetics and Systems Research (pp. 191–197). Amsterdam, New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  29. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1984). Komplexe Systeme. In: K. Kornwachs (Hrg.): Offenheit-Zeitlichkeit-Komplexität. Zur Theorie der Offenen Systeme (pp. 110–166). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  30. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1985). Pragmatic Information as a Nonclassical Concept to Describe Cognitive Processes. Cognitive Systems, 1, (1), 79–94.Google Scholar
  31. Kornwachs, K., Lucadou, W.v. (1989). Open systems and complexity. In: G.J. Dalenoort (ed.): The Paradigm of Self-Organization. (pp. 123–145). New York, London, Paris: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  32. Krampen, G. (1981). IPC-Fragebogen zu Kontrollüberzeugungen (“Locus of Control”). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  33. Lucadou, W.v. (1986). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Beeinflußbarkeit von stochastischen quantenphysikalischen Systemen durch den Beobachter. Frankfurt: H.-A. Herchen Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Lucadou, W.v. (1989a). Psyche und Chaos. Freiburg: Aurum Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Lucadou, W.v. (1989b). Non-locality in complex systems. In: Rossel, E. Heylighen, F., De Meyere, F. (eds.): Self-steering and Cognition in Complex Systems. Studies in Cybernetics Vol II. New York, London, Paris: Gordon and Breach (in print).Google Scholar
  36. Lucadou, W.v. (1989c). Non-locality in Complex Systems — a Way out of Isolation? Paper for the Sugarloaf Meeting on “The Relationship Between Mind and Matter”, May 4th to 7th, Philadelphia, (to be published).Google Scholar
  37. Lucadou, W.v. (1989d). The problem of repeatability in experiments with complex systems. Paper presented at the 7th Workshop of the European Society for the Study of Cognitive Systems, St. Maximin-La-Sainte-Baume, Provence, France, 19–22 June 1989.Google Scholar
  38. Lucadou, W.v., Kornwachs, K. (1983). The Problem of Reductionism from a System-Theoretical Viewpoint. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 14, (2), 338–349.Google Scholar
  39. May, E.C., Hubbard, G.S., Humphrey, B.S. (1985). New Evidence for Interaction Between Quantum Systems and Human Observers. Paper given at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration at Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  40. Morgenstern, R., Wiehaus, A., Thielmann, U. (1976). Interference of autoionizing transitions in time-dependent fields. Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics, 10, (6), 1039–1058.Google Scholar
  41. Nelson, R.D. & Radin, D.I. (1989). Statistically robust anomalous effects: Replication in random event generators. Foundations of Physics, 20 (in print).Google Scholar
  42. Neumann, J.v. (1966). The Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata (pp. 74–80). Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  43. Pattee, H.H. (1987). The measurement Problem in Physics, Computation and Cognition. (To be published).Google Scholar
  44. Paty, M. (1977). The recent attempts to verify quantum mechanics. In: J.L. Lopes, M. Paty (eds.). Quantum Mechanics, a Half Century Later (pp.261–289). Dordrecht: D.Reidel.Google Scholar
  45. Ristik, M.L. (1981). Makroskopische Quanteneffekte. In: J. Nitsch, J. Pfarr, E.-W. Stachow (Hrg.): Grundlagenprobleme der modernen Physik (pp.243–255). Mannheim, Wien, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenthal, R. (1969). Interpersonal expectancies: the effects of the experimenter's hypothesis. In: R. Rosenthal and R. Rosnow (eds), Artifact in Behavioral Research (pp. 181–277). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenthal, R., Rubin, D.B. (1978) Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Science, 3, 377–415.Google Scholar
  48. Schuster, H.G. (1984). Deterministic Chaos: An Introduction. Weinheim: Physik Verlag.Google Scholar
  49. Sellerie, F. (1983). Die Debatte um die Quantentheorie. Braunschweig, Wiesbaden: Vieweg.Google Scholar
  50. Varela, F.J. (1981). Autonomy and autopoiesis. In: G. Roth, H. Schwengler (eds.): Self-organizing systems (pp. 14–23). Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  51. Walker, E.H., May E.C., Spottiswoode, S.J.P. & Piantanida, T. (1987). Testing Schrödinger's Paradox with a Michelson Interferometer”. International Workshop on Matter Wave Interferometry. Technische Universität Wien, Atominstitut der österreichischen Universitäten, 14–16 September.Google Scholar
  52. Weizsäcker, E.v. (1974). Erstmaligkeit und Bestätigung als Komponenten der pragmatischen Information. In: E. v. Weizsäcker (Hrg.): Offene Systeme I (pp. 83–113). Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
  53. Wigner, E.P. (1967) Symmetries and Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter v. Lucadou
    • 1
  1. 1.Freiburg

Personalised recommendations