Advertisement

Representation and use of teleological knowledge in the multi-modeling approach

  • Giorgio Brajnik
  • Luca Chittaro
  • Giovanni Guida
  • Carlo Tasso
  • Elio Toppano
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 549)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bobrow D. (Ed.), Special volume on Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems, Artificial Intelligence 24., 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Brajnik G., Chittaro L., Costantini C., Guida G., Tasso C., Toppano E. “Un approccio alla rappresentazione di sistemi fisici basato sull'utilizzo di modelli eterogenei”, Atti Primo Congresso dell'AI *IA, Trento, 1989, pp. 221–232.Google Scholar
  3. Brajnik G., Chittaro L., Tasso C., Toppano E. “Epistemology, organization and use of functional knowledge for reasoning about physical systems”, Proc. AVIGNON '90: 10th International Workshop on Expert Systems and Their Application: General Conference Second Generation Expert Systems, Avignon, France, 1990, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
  4. Chittaro L., Costantini C., Guida G., Tasso C., Toppano E. “Diagnosis based on cooperation of multiple knowledge sources,” Proc. AVIGNON '89: 9th International Workshop on Expert Systems and Their Application: Specialized Conference Second Generation Expert Systems, Avignon, France, 1989, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
  5. De Kleer J. “How circuits work,” Artificial Intelligence 24, 1984, pp. 205–280.Google Scholar
  6. De Kleer J., Brown J.S. “A qualitative physics based on confluences,” Artificial Intelligence 24, 1984, pp. 7–83.Google Scholar
  7. Downing K. “The qualitative criticism of circulatory models via bipartite teleological analysis,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol.2 no.3, 1990, pp. 149–171.Google Scholar
  8. Falkenhainer B., Forbus K.D. “Setting up large scale qualitative models,” Proc. 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, St. Paul, MN, 1988, pp. 301–306.Google Scholar
  9. Fink P.K., Lusth J.C. “Expert systems and diagnostic expertise in the mechanical and electrical domains,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-17(3), 1987, pp. 340–349.Google Scholar
  10. Keuneke A. “Machine understanding of devices. Causal explanation of diagnostic conclusions” PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. Liu Z. and Farley A. M. “Shifting ontological perspectives in reasoning about physical systems,” Proc. 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, 1990, pp. 395–400.Google Scholar
  12. Paynter H.M. Analysis and design of engineering systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1961.Google Scholar
  13. Sembugamoorthy V. and Chandrasekaran B. “Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem solving systems,” Experience, Memory and Reasoning, J.L. Kolodner and C.K. Riesbeck (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, pp. 47–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Brajnik
    • 1
  • Luca Chittaro
    • 1
  • Giovanni Guida
    • 2
  • Carlo Tasso
    • 1
  • Elio Toppano
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica e InformaticaUniversità di UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Automazione IndustrialeUniversità di BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations