Advertisement

Using defeasible logic for a window on a probabilistic database: Some preliminary notes

  • James Cussens
  • Anthony Hunter
Contributed Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 548)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baccus F (1989) A modest, but semantically well-founded, inheritance reasoner, IJCAI-89, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell J (1990) Non-monotonic reasoning, non-monotonic logics, and reasoning about change. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4, 79–108Google Scholar
  3. Besnard P (1989) An Introduction to Default Logic, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewka G (1989) Preferred sub-theories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning, IJCAI-89, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  5. Donini F (1990) Non-monotonic reasoning Artificial Intelligence Review, 4, 163–210Google Scholar
  6. Etherington D (1988) Reasoning with incomplete information, RNAI, PitmanGoogle Scholar
  7. Gabbay D (1985) Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems, in Apt K, Proc. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems, Springer, 439–457Google Scholar
  8. Gabbay D (1989) Labelled Deductive Systems, Technical Report, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, also to be published by Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabbay D, Gillies D, Hunter A, Muggleton S, Ng Y, & Richards B (1991) The rule based systems project: using confirmation theory and non-monotonic logics for incremental learning Proc. of the First Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Grosof B (1988) Non-monotonicity in probabilistic reasoning Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 3Google Scholar
  11. Hunter A (1990) KAL: A linear ordered logic for non-monotonic reasoning Draft Paper, Department of Computing, Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Laenens E & Vermier D (1990) A fixpoint semantics for ordered logic,) Logic & Computation, 1Google Scholar
  13. Loui R (1986) Defeat amongst arguments: a system of defeasible inference, Technical Report No 130, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Neufeld E, Poole D, and Aleliunas R (1990) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 121–132Google Scholar
  15. Nute D (1988) Defeasible reasoning and decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 4, 97–110Google Scholar
  16. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  17. Poole D (1988) Logical framework for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, 36, 27–48Google Scholar
  18. Pollock J (1987) Defeasible reasoning, Cognitive Science, 11, 481–518Google Scholar
  19. Shafer G (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Vermier D, Nute D & Geerts F (1989) A logic for defeasible perspectives, Proc of the 1988 Tubingen Workshop on Semantic Networks and Non-monotonic Reasoning, vol 1, 1–27, SNS-Bericht 89–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Cussens
    • 1
  • Anthony Hunter
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Logic and Probability in ITKing's CollegeLondon
  2. 2.Department of ComputingImperial CollegeLondon

Personalised recommendations