Constructing models of hidden structure

  • Jan M. Źytkow
  • Paul J. Fischer
Communications Learning and Adaptive Systems
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 542)


The search for structure hidden inside of visible objects has been a universal research task in Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Philosophy, and other disciplines. Discovering hidden structure is an especially challenging type of constructive induction. Not only must all the elements of hidden structure be postulated by the discoverer, but they can only be verified by indirect evidence, available at the level of observable objects. In this paper we describe a framework for the automation of hidden structure discovery. We define what is meant by hidden structure and we present a number of operators that can build models of hidden structure step by step. Our models of hidden structure consist of hidden objects of several types, admissible combinations of hidden objects, the attributes of hidden objects and their combinations, a mapping between the hidden and the observed structure, and reactions described in terms of hidden objects. We analyze the discovery of atoms, genes, and quarks to demonstrate the generality of our operators. We demonstrate how domain knowledge on the visible level is useful in operator instantiation. We discuss efficient control structures, and we define the criteria for model evaluation. Because hidden structure cannot be verified by direct observations, a successful model must pass two stages of evaluation. First, the observational consequences must be confirmed, and second, the model must be unique in its simplicity class.


Hidden structure discovery and evaluation quark models 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Fischer, P. and Źytkow, J. 1990. Discovering Quarks and Hidden Structure. Methodologies for Intelligent Systems 5, New York: North Holland, 362–370.Google Scholar
  2. Harari H. 1979. Schematic Model of Quarks and Leptons. Physics Letters. B86, 83–86.Google Scholar
  3. Kocabas, S. 1991. Conflict Resolution as Discovery in Particle Physics. Machine Learning 6, 277–309.Google Scholar
  4. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., and Źytkow, J.M. 1987. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lindsay, R., Buchanan, B.G., Feigenbaum, E. A. and Lederberg, R. 1980. Dendral. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Rose, D. 1989. Using Domain Knowledge to Aid Scientific Theory Revision. Proc. of the Sixth Int. Workshop on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publ., San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Rose, D. and Langley, P. 1986. Chemical discovery as belief revision. Machine Learning, 1, 423–452.Google Scholar
  8. Valdes-Perez, R.Z. 1990. Machine Discovery of Chemical Reaction Pathways. Phd. Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan M. Źytkow
    • 1
  • Paul J. Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentWichita State UniversityWichita

Personalised recommendations