Advertisement

Recent findings in software process maturity

  • Watts S. Humphrey
Research Issues And Results
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 509)

Abstract

After several years of using the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) software process maturity framework, preliminary data is now available. This paper provides an overview of the SEI methods, summarizes the current data, and discusses the trends and implications of this work. The paper opens with a brief summary of the importance of software to modern society. It then discusses the software process and software process maturity. The principles of software process assessments are next described along with the various assessment types introduced by the SEI. The general state of software practice is then covered, including data on U.S. and Japanese software organizations. The paper concludes with some observations on the state of software practice and comments on the rates of organizational improvement.

Keywords

assessment improvement management process maturity productivity quality software state of practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1] [CUR88]
    Curtis, B., H. Krasner, N. Iscoe, “A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems,” Communications of the ACM, 31 (11), November 1988, pp. 1268–1287.Google Scholar
  2. [2] [CUS89]
    Cusumano, M., “The Software Factory: A Historical Interpretation,” IEEE Software, March 1989, pp. 23–30.Google Scholar
  3. [3] [DIO89]
    Dion, R., “Qualifying the Benefit of Software Process Improvement,” Proceedings, 1989 SEPG Workshop, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  4. [4] [HUM87]
    Humphrey, W. S., W. Sweet, et al., A Method for Assessing the Software Engineering Capability of Contractors, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-87-TR-23, ADA187230, September 1987.Google Scholar
  5. [5] [HUM89a]
    Humphrey, W. S., Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. [6] [HUM89b]
    Humphrey, W. S., D. H. Kitson, T. K. Kasse, The State of Software Engineering Practice: A Preliminary Report, Technical Report CMU/SEI-89-TR-1, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, February 1989.Google Scholar
  7. [7] [HUM91a]
    Humphrey, W. S., T. Snyder, and R. Willis, “Software Process Improvement at Hughes Aircraft Company,” IEEE Software, in press, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. [8] [HUM91b]
    Humphrey, W. S., D. H. Kitson, and J. L. Gale, “A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity,” Proceedings 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, TX, May 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [9] [KOL]
    Kolkhorst, B. G. and A. J. Macinea, “Developing Error-Free Software, Proceedings of Computer Assurance Congress '88, IEEE Washington Section on System Safety, 27 June 1–July 1988, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
  10. [10] [OLS89]
    Olson, T. G., W. S. Humphrey, and D. H. Kitson, Conducting SEI-Assisted Software Process Assessments, Technical Report CMU/SEI-89-TR-7, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, February 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Watts S. Humphrey
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Engineering InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations