Advertisement

Three Approaches to Hardware Verification: HOL, MDG, and VIS Compared

  • Soène Tahar
  • Jianping Lu
  • Paul Curzon
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1522)

Abstract

There exist a wide range of hardware verification tools, some based on interactive theorem proving and other more automated tools based on decision diagrams. In this paper, we compare three different verification systems covering the spectrum of today’s verification technology. In particular, we consider HOL, MDG and VIS. HOL is an interactive theorem proving system based on higher-order logic. VIS is an automatic system based on ROBDDs and integrating verification with simulation and synthesis. The MDG system is an intermediate approach based on Multiway Decision Graphs providing automation while accommodating abstract data sorts, uninterpreted functions and rewriting. As the basis for our comparison we used all three systems to independently verify a fabricated ATM communications chip: the Fairisle 4×4 switch fabric.

Keywords

Model Check Equivalence Check Asynchronous Transfer Mode Safety Property Abstract State Machine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Bryant. Graph-based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-35(8):677–691, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Brayton et. al. VIS: A System for Verification and Synthesis In R. Alur and T. Henzinger, eds, Computer Aided Verification, LNCS 1102, 428–432, Springer-Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Corella, Z. Zhou, X. Song, M. Langevin, and E. Cerny. Multiway Decision Graphs for Automated Hardware Verification. Formal Methods in System Design, 10(1):7–46, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Curzon and I.M. Leslie. Improving Hardware Designs whilst Simplifying their Proof. Designing Correct Circuits, Workshops in Comp., Springer-Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Edgcombe. The Qudos Quick Chip User Guide. Qudos Limited.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Garcez and W. Rosenstiel. The Verification of an ATM Switching Fabric using the HSIS Tool. In IX Brazilian Symp. on the Design of Integrated Circuits, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.J.C. Gordon and T.F. Melham. Introduction to HOL: A Theorem Proving Environment for Higher-order Logic. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Jakubiec, S. Coupet-Grimal, and P. Curzon. A Comparison of the Coq and HOL Proof Systems for Specifying Hardware. In E. Gunter and A. Felty, eds, Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics: Short Presentations, 63–78, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I.M. Leslie and D.R. McAuley. Fairisle: An ATM Network for the Local Area. ACM Communication Review, 19(4):327–336, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.E. Long. Model Checking, Abstraction and Compositional Verification. Ph.D thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, July 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Lu and S. Tahar. Practical Approaches to the Automatic Verification of an ATM Switch Fabric using VIS. In Proc. IEEE Great Lakes Symp. on VLSI, 368–373, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Schneider and T. Kropf. Verifying Hardware Correctness by Combining Theorem Proving and Model Checking. In J. Alves-Foss, editor, Higher Order Logic Theorem Proving and Its Applications: Short Presentations, 89–104, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Tahar, Z. Zhou, X. Song, E. Cerny, and M. Langevin. Formal Verification of an ATM Switch Fabric using Multiway Decision Graphs. In Proc. IEEE Great Lakes Symp. on VLSI, 106–111, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soène Tahar
    • 1
  • Jianping Lu
    • 1
  • Paul Curzon
    • 2
  1. 1.ECE DepartmentCononcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.School of Computing ScienceMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations