Advertisement

The 8th Workshop for PhD Students in Object-Oriented Systems

  • Erik Ernst
  • Frank Gerhardt
  • Luigi Benedicenti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1543)

Abstract

Each year since 1991 there has been a workshop for PhD students at the ECOOP conference. It is every every year conducted by the network of PhD Students in Object-Oriented Systems (PhDOOS), hence it is an event for PhD students by PhD students. The purpose of the PhDOOS network is to help leveraging the collective resources of young researchers in the object community by improving the communication and collaboration between them. During a year, the PhDOOS workshop is the main event where we meet face-to-face. Between workshops we stay in touch through our mailing list. More information on the PhDOOS network can be found at http://www.phdoos.org/.

Keywords

Information System Operating System Communication Network Database Management Programming Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Bjarnason. Interactive Tool Support for Domain-Specific Languages. Licentiate Thesis. Dept. of Computer Science, LU-CS-TR:97-192. Dept. of Computer Science, Lund University, December 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grel Hedin. An Overview of Door Attribute Grammars. International Conference on Compiler Construction (CC’94), pp 31–51. LNCS 786, Springer Verlag. 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roger Henriksson. Ph.D Thesis (in preparation) Dept. of Computer Science, Lund University, September 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klas Nilsson. Industrial Robot Programming Ph.D Thesis. Dept. of Automatic Control, Lund University, May 1996.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas Ludwig, Roland Wismüller, Vaidy Sunderam, and Arndt Bode. OMIS — On-Line Monitoring Interface Specification (Version 2.0), volume 9 of Research Report Series, Lehrstuhl für Rechnertechnik und Rechnerorganisation (LRR-TUM), Technische Universität München. Shaker, Aachen, 1997.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    Rgis Crelier. OP2: A Portable Oberon Compiler. Technical report 125, ETH Zrich, February 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michael D. Ernst. Practical fine-grained static slicing of optimized code. Technical report MSR-TR-94-14, Microsoft Research.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Susan Horwitz, Thomas Reps, David Binkley. Interprocedural Slicing Using Dependence Graphs. ACM TOPLAS vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panos E. Livadas, Theodore Johnson. An Optimal Algorithm for the Construction of the System Dependence Graph. Technical report, Computer and Information Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1995, ftp://ftp.cis.ufl.edu/cis/tech-reports/tr95/tr95-011.ps.Z
  5. 5.
    Hanspeter Mssenbck, Niklaus Wirth. The Programming Language Oberon-2, Structured Programming, vol. 12, no. 4, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christoph Steindl. Program Slicing (1)-Data Structures and Computation of Control Flow Information. Technical report 11, Institut fr Praktische Informatik, JKU Linz, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christoph Steindl. Program Slicing (2)-Computation of Data Flow Information. Technical report 12, Institut fr Praktische Informatik, JKU Linz, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mark Weiser. Program Slicing. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol. SE-10, no. 4, July 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sean Zhang, Barbara G. Ryder. Complexity of Single Level Function Pointer Aliasing Analysis.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    R. Arthaud, OMT-RT. Extensions of OMT for better Describing Dynamic Behavior, in proc. TOOLS Europe’ 95, Versailles, France, February 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Awad, J. Kuusela, J. Ziegler. Object-Oriented Technology for Real-Time Systems: A Practical Approach Using OMT nd Fusion, Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Burns, A. Wellings, HRT-HOOD: A Structured Design Method for Hard Real-Time Ada Systems, Real-time Safety Critical Systems V3, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. P. Douglass. Real-Time UML, Object technology Series, Addison Wesley, 1998. Leblanc96 P. Leblanc, V. Encontre, ObjectGeode: Method Guidelines, VERILOG SA, 1996. Sellic94 B. Sellic et al. Real time Object-oriented Modeling, John Wiley Publisher, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Terrier et al. Diveloppement multitbche par objet: la solution ACCORD. In proc. Ginie Logiciel’ 97, Paris, December 1997.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    C. Pons, G. Baum, M. Felder. A dynamic logic framework for the formal foundation of object-oriented analysis and design, technical Report available from http://www.lifia-info.unlp.edu.ar/~cpons.

References

  1. 1.
    Winnie Weiqun Qiu The Refinement of Component-based Systems, position paper, July 1998, http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~weiqun

References

  1. 1.
    Fayad M.E. and Schmidt D.C.: Object-Oriented Application Frameworks. Communications of the ACM, 40(10):32–38, October 1997Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pree, W.: Design Patterns for Object Oriented Software Development. Addison Wesley, Reading MA, 1996Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Viljaama, P.: The Patterns Business: Impressions from PLoP-94. ACM Software Engineering Notes 20(1):74–78, January 1995Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    P. Cointe. Towards the Design of a CLOS Metaobject Kernel: ObjVlisp as a first Layer. In Proceedings of the first International Workshop On Lisp Evolution and Standardization (IWOLES), Paris, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Ducournau. Y3. YAFOOL, le language objets. Sema Group, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Graubi and P. Cointe. Une Introduction CLOS et ses Mitaobjets. In Proceedings of the Greco/Groplan Workshop on Language and Algorithms, Rouen, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.D. Karp. The Design Space of Frame Knwoledge Representation Systems. Technical Note 520, SRI International, Menlo Park, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Kiczales, J. des Rivihres, and D.G. Bobrow. The Art of the Meta-Object Protocol. MIT Press, 1991. KG89 Sonya E. Keene and Dan Gerson. Object-oriented programming in Common LISP: a programmer’s guide to CLOS. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Paepcke. User-level language crafting: Introducing The CLOS Metaobject Protocol. In A. Paepcke, editor, Object-Oriented Programming: The CLOS Perspective, pages 65–99. MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Rathke. Object-Oriented Programming and Frame-Based Knowledge Representation. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Boston, pages 95–98, 1993. Ste90 G.L. Steele. Common Lisp, the Language. Digital Press, second edition, 1990.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    J. van Katwijk and E. M. Dusink. Reusable software and software components. In R. J. Gautier and P. J. L. Wallis, editors, Software Reuse with Ada, pages 15–22. Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1990.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    Grady Booch. Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., 390 Bridge Parkway Redwood City, California 94065, USA, second edition, 1994. ISBN 0-8053-5340-2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Booch and J. Rumbaugh and I. Jacobson, The Unified Modelling Language for Object Oriented Development Documentation Set, Version 1.1, Rational Software Corporation, September 1997. http://www.rational.com/unl/docuunentation.html
  3. 3.
    Object Management Group. Common Object Request Broker Architecture, OMG Technical Documentation Archive, 1997. http://www.omg.org/corba/
  4. 4.
    SunSoft. Remote Method Invocation Specification. Sun Microsystems Inc., 2550 Garcia Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043, USA, 1997, http://www.javasoft.com/products/jdk/1.1/docs/guide/rmi/ Uzun98 Umit Uzun. The role of network architectures in design methodologies for distributed object computing. In BAS’98 The Third Symposioum on Computer Networks, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey, June 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Ernst
    • 1
  • Frank Gerhardt
    • 2
  • Luigi Benedicenti
    • 3
  1. 1.DEVISE, Comp.Sci.DeptUniversity of ÅrhusDenmark
  2. 2.Daimler-Benz AG, Dept. IO/TMStuttgartGermany
  3. 3.DIST - Universita di GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations