Advertisement

Verification of Hierarchical State/Event Systems Using Reusability and Compositionality

  • Gerd Behrmann
  • Kim G. Larsen
  • Henrik R. Andersen
  • Henrik Hulgaard
  • Jørn Lind-Nielsen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1579)

Abstract

We investigate techniques for verifying hierarchical systems, i.e., finite state systems with a nesting capability. The straightforward way of analysing a hierarchical system is to first flatten it into an equivalent non-hierarchical system and then apply existing finite state system verification techniques. Though conceptually simple, flattening is severely punished by the hierarchical depth of a system. To alleviate this problem, we develop a technique that exploits the hierarchical structure to reuse earlier reachability checks of superstates to conclude reachability of substates. We combine the reusability technique with the successful compositional technique of [13] and investigate the combination experimentally on industrial systems and hierarchical systems generated according to our expectations to real systems. The experimental results are very encouraging: whereas a flattening approach degrades in performance with an increase in the hierarchical depth (even when applying the technique of [13]), the new approach proves not only insensitive to the hierarchical depth, but even leads to improved performance as the depth increases.

Keywords

Model Check Serial State Hierarchical System Reachability Analysis Primitive State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Baan VisualState A/S. http://www.visualstate.com.
  2. 2.
    I-Logix Inc. http://www.ilogix.com.
  3. 3.
    ObjecTime Limited. http://www.objectime.on.ca.
  4. 4.
    Rational Software Corporation. http://www.rational.com.
  5. 5.
    Rajeev Alur and Mihalis Yannakakis. Model Checking of Hierarchical State Machines. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Foundations, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steffen Braa Andersen, Gerd Behrmann, Claus Krogholm Pedersen, and Peter Smed Vestergaard. Reuseability and Compositionality applied to Verification of Hierarchical Systems. Master’s thesis, Aalborg University, June 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerd Behrmann, Kim G. Larsen, Henrik R. Andersen, Henrik Hulgaard, and Jørn Lind-Nielsen. Verification of Hierarchical State/Event Systems. To appear as a BRICS report (http://www.brics.dk), 1999.
  8. 8.
    G. Booch, I. Jacobsen, and J. Rumbaugh. Unified Modelling Language User Guide. Addison Wesley, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Randal E. Bryant. Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-35:677–691, August 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    David Harel. Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 8:231–274, 1987.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Jahanian and A. K. Mok. A graphtheoretic approach for timing analysis and its implementation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-36(8):961–975, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. G. Leveson, M. P. E. Heimdahl, H. Hildreth, and J. D. Reese. Requiremets specification for process control systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(9):694–707, September 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jørn Lind-Nielsen, Henrik Reif Andersen, Gerd Behrmann, Henrik Hulgaard, Kåre Kristoffersen, and Kim G. Larsen. Verification of Large State/Event Systems using Compositionality and Dependency Analysis. In Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 1384 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 201–216. Springer, March/April 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    David Y. W. Park, Jens U. Skakkebæk, and David L. Dill. Static Analysis to Identify Invariants in RSML Specifications. In Formal Techniques in Real-Time and Fault-Tolerant Systems, volume 1486 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 133–142. Springer, September 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorensen. Object-oriented modeling and design. Prentice-Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Selic, G. Gullekson, and P. T. Ward. Real-time object oriented modeling and design. J. Wiley, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerd Behrmann
    • 1
  • Kim G. Larsen
    • 1
  • Henrik R. Andersen
    • 2
  • Henrik Hulgaard
    • 2
  • Jørn Lind-Nielsen
    • 2
  1. 1.BRICSAalborg UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Information TechnologyDTUDenmark

Personalised recommendations