Advertisement

System Abstract: E 0.3

  • Stephan Schulz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1632)

Abstract

We describe the main characteristics of version 0.3 of the E equational theorem prover. E is based on superposition and rewriting. It features a powerful interface for specifying search guiding heuristics. We discuss some important details of the implementation and demonstrate the performance of the prover by presenting experimental results on the TPTP. Finally, we describe our future plans for improving the system.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BDP89.
    L. Bachmair, N. Dershowitz, and D.A. Plaisted. Completion Without Failure. Coll. on the Resolution of Equations in Algebraic Structures, Austin, 1987. Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. BG94.
    L. Bachmair and H. Ganzinger. Rewrite-Based Equational Theorem Proving with Selection and Simplification. Journal of Logic and Computation, 3(4):217–247, 1994.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Der91.
    N. Dershowitz. Ordering-Based Strategies for Horn Clauses. 12th IJCAI, Sydney, pp. 118–124. Morgan-Kaufmann, 1991Google Scholar
  4. DKS97.
    J. Denzinger, M. Kronenburg, and S. Schulz. DISCOUNT: A Distributed and Learning Equational Prover. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 18(2):189–198, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gra95.
    P. Graf.Term Indexing. LNAI 1053. Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. MIL+97.
    M. Moser, O. Ibens, R. Letz, J. Steinbach, C. Goller, J. Schumann, and K. Mayr. SETHEO and E-SETHEO-The CADE-13 Systems. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 18(2):237–246, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mos96.
    M. Moser. Goal-Directed Reasoning in Clausal Logic with Equality. CS Press, München, 1996. Ph.D. Thesis, Fakultät für Informatik, TU München.Google Scholar
  8. MW97.
    W.W. McCune and L. Wos. Otter: The CADE-13 Competition Incarnations. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 18(2):211–220, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. SSY94.
    G. Sutcliffe, C.B. Suttner, and T. Yemenis. The TPTP Problem Library. Proc. CADE-12, Nancy, LNAI 814, pp. 252–266. Springer, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. WGR96.
    C. Weidenbach, B. Gaede, and G. Rock. SPASS & FLOTTER Version 0.42. Proc. CADE-13, New Brunswick, LNAI 1104, pp. 141–145. Springer, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Schulz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für InformatikTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations