B. Barras, S. Boutin, C. Cornes, J. Courant, J.C. Filliatre, E. Giménez, H. Herbelin, G. Huet, C. Muñoz, C. Murthy, C. Parent, C. Paulin, A. Saïbi, and B. Werner. The Coq Proof Assistant Reference Manual-Version V6.1. Technical Report 0203, INRIA, August 1997.
Pascal Brisset and Olivier Ridoux. The compilation of λProlog and its execution with MALI. Publication Interne No 687, IRISA, Rennes, November 1992.
Amy Felty. Implementing tactics and tacticals in a higher-order logic programming language. Journal of Automated Reasoning
, 11(1):43–81, August 1993.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Richard A. Hagen and Peter J. Robinson. Qu-Prolog 4.3 reference manual. Technical Report 99-03, Software Verification Research Centre, School of Information Technology, University of Queensland, 1999.
John Hannan and Dale Miller. From operational semantics to abstract machines. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
, 2(4):415–459, 1992.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keehang Kwon, Gopalan Nadathur, and Debra Sue Wilson. Implementing polymorphic typing in a logic programming language. Computer Languages
, 20(1):25–42, 1994.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale Miller and Gopalan Nadathur. A logic programming approach to manipulating formulas and programs. In Seif Haridi, editor, IEEE Symposium on Logic Programming, pages 379–388. IEEE Computer Society Press, September 1987.
Dale Miller, Gopalan Nadathur, Frank Pfenning, and Andre Scedrov. Uniform proofs as a foundation for logic programming. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
, 51:125–157, 1991.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
Gopalan Nadathur. A proof procedure for the logic of hereditary Harrop formulas. Journal of Automated Reasoning
, 11(1):115–145, August 1993.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Gopalan Nadathur. An explicit substitution notation in a λProlog implementation. Technical Report TR-98-01, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, January 1998.
Gopalan Nadathur, Bharat Jayaraman, and Keehang Kwon. Scoping constructs in logic programming: Implementation problems and their solution. Journal of Logic Programming
, 25(2):119–161, November 1995.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Gopalan Nadathur, Bharat Jayaraman, and Debra Sue Wilson. Implementation considerations for higher-order features in logic programming. Technical Report CS-1993-16, Department of Computer Science, Duke University, June 1993.
Gopalan Nadathur and Dale Miller. An overview of λProlog. In Kenneth A. Bowen and Robert A. Kowalski, editors, Fifth International Logic Programming Conference, pages 810–827. MIT Press, August 1988.
Gopalan Nadathur and Guanshan Tong. Realizing modularity in λProlog. Technical Report TR-97-07, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, August 1997. To appear in Journal of Functional and Logic Programming.
Gopalan Nadathur and Debra Sue Wilson. A notation for lambda terms: A generalization of environments. Theoretical Computer Science
, 198(1-2):49–98, 1998.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Lawrence C. Paulson. Isabelle: A Generic Theorem Prover
, volume 828of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
. Springer Verlag, 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar
Frank Pfenning. Logic programming in the LF logical framework. In Gérard Huet and Gordon D. Plotkin, editors, Logical Frameworks. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Frank Pfenning and Conal Elliott. Higher-order abstract syntax. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 199–208. ACM Press, June 1988.
D.H.D. Warren. An abstract Prolog instruction set. Technical Note 309, SRI International, October 1983.
Philip Wickline and Dale Miller. The Terzo 1.1b implementation of λProlog. Distribution in NJ-SML source files. See http://www.cse.psu.edu/~dale/lProlog/
, April 1997.