Abstract
We define a class of modal logics LF by uniformly extending a class of modal logics L. Each logic L is characterised by a class of first-order definable frames, but the corresponding logic LF is sometimes characterised by classes of modal frames that are not first-order definable. The class LF includes provability logics with deep arithmetical interpretations. Using Belnap’s proof-theoretical framework Display Logic we characterise the “pseudo-displayable” subclass of LF and show how to define polynomial-time transformations from each such LF into the corresponding L, and hence into first-order classical logic. Theorem provers for classical first-order logic can then be used to mechanise deduction in these “psuedo-displayable second order” modal logics.
Visit to ARP supported by an Australian Research Council International Fellowship.
Supported by an Australian Research Council Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Y. Auffray, P. Enjalbert, and J.-J. Herbrard. Strategies for modal resolution: results and problems. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 6:1–38, 1990.
A. Avron. On modal systems having arithmetical interpretations. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49(3):935–942, 1984.
N. Belnap. Display logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11:375–417, 1982.
M. Borga and P. Gentilini. On the proof theory of the modal logic Grz. Zeitschrift füur Mathematik Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 32:145–148, 1986.
Ph. Balbiani and A. Herzig. A translation from the modal logic of provability into K4. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 4:73–77, 1994.
G. Boolos. The Logic of Provability. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
S. Demri and R. Goré. An O((n.log n)3)-time transformation from Grz into decidable fragments of classical first-order logic. In Selected papers of FTP’98, Vienna. LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 1999. to appear.
S. Demri and R. Goré. Theoremhood preserving maps as a characterisation of cut elimination for provability logics. Technical report, A.R.P., A.N.U., 1999. Forthcoming.
G. d’Agostino, A. Montanari, and A. Policriti. A set-theoretical translation method for polymodal logics. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 15:317–337, 1995.
M. Fitting. Proof methods for modal and intuitionistic logics. D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1983.
H. Ganzinger, U. Hustadt, and R. Meyer, C. Schmidt. A resolution-based decision procedure for extensions of K4. In 2nd Workshop on Advances in Modal Logic (AiML’98), Uppsala, Sweden, October 1998. to appear.
R. Goré.Tableaux methods for modal and temporal logics. In M. d’Agostino, D. Gabbay, R. Hähnle, and J. Posegga, editors, Handbook of Tableaux Methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999. To appear.
A. Herzig. Raisonnement automatique en logique modale et algorithmes d’unification. PhD thesis, Université P. Sabatier, Toulouse, 1989.
U. Hustadt and R. Schmidt. On evaluating decision procedures for modal logic. In IJCAI-15, pages 202–207. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
M. Kracht. Power and weakness of the modal display calculus. In H. Wansing, editor, Proof theory of modal logic, pages 93–121. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
D. Leivant. On the proof theory of the modal logic for arithmetical provability. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 46(3):531–538, 1981.
F. Massacci. Strongly analytic tableaux for normal modal logics. In A. Bundy, editor, CADE-12, pages 723–737. LNAI 814, July 1994.
G. Mints. Gentzen-type and resolution rules part I: propositional logic. In P. Martin-Löf and G. Mints, editors, International Conference on Computer Logic, Tallinn, pages 198–231. LNCS 417, 1988.
Ch. Morgan. Methods for automated theorem proving in non classical logics. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 25(8):852–862, 1976.
A. Nonnengart and A. Szalas. A fixpoint approach to second-order quantifier elimination with applications to correspondence theory. In E. Or lowska, editor, Logic at Work. Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa, pages 89–108. Physica Verlag, 1998.
H.J. Ohlbach. A resolution calculus for modal logics. In CADE-9, pages 500–516. LNCS 310, 1988.
H.J. Ohlbach. Combining Hilbert style and semantic reasoning in a resolution framework. In C. Kirchner and H. Kirchner, editors, CADE-15, Lindau, Germany, pages 205–219. LNAI 1421, 1998.
Ch. Papadimitriou. Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1994.
H. Sahlqvist. Completeness and correspondence in the first and second order semantics for modal logics. In S. Kanger, editor, 3rd Scandinavian Logic Symposium, pages 110–143. North Holland, 1975.
R. Schmidt. Decidability by resolution for propositional modal logics. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1999. To appear.
G. Sambin and S. Valentini. A modal sequent calculus for a fragment of arithmetic. Studia Logica, 39:245–256, 1980.
G. Sambin and S. Valentini. The modal logic of provability. The sequential approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11:311–342, 1982.
S. Valentini. The modal logic of provability: cut-elimination. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 12:471–476, 1983.
H. Wansing. Sequent calculi for normal modal propositional logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 4(2):125–142, 1994.
H. Wansing. Displaying Modal Logic, volume 3 of Trends in Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Demri, S., Goré, R. (1999). Tractable Transformations from Modal Provability Logics into First-Order Logic. In: Automated Deduction — CADE-16. CADE 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48660-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48660-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66222-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48660-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive