Skip to main content

Spatial Universals as the Human Spatial Notion

  • Conference paper
  • 303 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1640))

Abstract

Peirce (CP 2.753) suggests that humans possess an inherited notion of space, which amongst other notions allows them to adapt to the environment. This paper discusses a conceptual graph approach to defining such spatial notions (i.e. spatial universals) as a finite set of canonical graphs and suggests its use to derive a potentially infinite number of canonical graphs. Our approach is illustrated by a bilingual example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen J.F.: “Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals” in Communications of the ACM, 26(11), pp832–843, 1983.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M.J. and Franzosa R.: “Point-set topological spatial relations” in International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(2), pp161–174, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esch J.W.: “Temporal Intervals”, In Nagle T.E., Nagle J.A., Laurie L.G. and Eklund P.W. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Current Research and Practice, pp363–380, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P.: “Induction and the Evolution” in “Charles Peirce and the Philosophy of Science IX”, D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, D. Westerstahl (eds.); pp. 423–449, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesgen H.-W.: “Spatial reasoning based on Allen’s temporal logic”, Technical Report TR-89-049, ICSI, Berkley/CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habel C: “Repräsentation räumlichen Wissens” in “Wissensrepräsentation in Expertensystemen”, G. Rahmsdorf (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández D.: “Qualitative Representation of Spatial Knowledge” in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (804), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits A.: “Language and Spatial Cognition”, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J.J.: “Recent Issues in Semantic Theory”, In Foundations of Language, International journal of language and philosophy, 3, pp 124–194, Dordrecht, Holland, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J.J., Fodor J.A.: “The structure in semantic theory”, In Language, Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 39, pp170–210, Baltimore, 1963. (Reprinted in Fodor J.A. and Katz J.J. (eds): “The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language”, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G., Johnson M.: “Metaphors we live by”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau B., Jackendoff R.: “‘What’ and ‘where’ in spatial language and spatial cognition”, In Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, pp217–265, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J.: “Introduction to theoretical linguistics”, Cambridge University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann G.A.: “A Relational Goal-Seeking Agent using Conceptual Graphs”, In Tepfenhart W.M., Dick J.P. and Sowa J.F. (eds), Conceptual Structures: Current Practices, Lecture Notes in AI 835, pp 113–126, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann G.A.: “Control of a Navigation Rational Agent by Natural Language”, PhD dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszek D., Finin T., Fritzson R., Overton C: “Endpoint Relations on Temporal Intervals”, In Proceedings of the Third Annual Rocky Mountain Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp182–188, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce C.S.: “Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce”, Hartshorne, Weiss and Burks (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick H.J. Jr.: “Organization of spatial knowledge in Children”, In Eilan N., McCarthy R., Brewer B. (eds.), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford: Blackwell, pp31–42, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regier T.: “The Human Semantic Potential-Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism”, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa J.F.: “Conceptual Structures”, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brennan, J. (1999). Spatial Universals as the Human Spatial Notion. In: Tepfenhart, W.M., Cyre, W. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Standards and Practices. ICCS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1640. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48659-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48659-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66223-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48659-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics