Skip to main content

Tractable and Decidable Fragments of Conceptual Graphs

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Standards and Practices (ICCS 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1640))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is well-known that problems like validity and subsumption of general CGs are undecidable, whereas subsumption is NP-complete for simple conceptual graphs (SGs) and tractable for SGs that are trees. We will employ results on decidable fragments of first-order logic to identify a natural and expressive fragment of CGs for which validity and subsumption is decidable in EXPTIME. In addition, we will extend existing work on the connection between SGs and description logics (DLs) by identifying a DL that corresponds to the class of SGs that are trees. This yields a tractability result previously unknown in the DL community.

This work was partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant No. GRK 185/3-98 and Project No. GR 1324/3-1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Andréka, J. van Benthem, and I. Németi. Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic. J. of Philosophical Logic, 27(3):217–274, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader, R. Molitor, and S. Tobies. The Guarded Fragment of Conceptual Graphs. LTCS-Report 98–10, available at http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/Papers.html.

  3. F. Baader, R. Molitor, and S. Tobies. On the Relationship between Descripion Logics and Conceptual Graphs. LTCS-Report 98–11, available at http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/Papers.html.

  4. E. Börger, E. Grädel, and Y. Gurevich. The Classical Decision Problem. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Chein and M. L. Mugnier. Conceptual graphs: fundamental notions. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 6(4):365–406, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Chein, M. L. Mugnier, and G. Simonet. Nested graphs: a graph-based knowledge representation model with FOL semantics. In Proc. KR’98, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Coupey and C. Faron. Towards correspondences between conceptual graphs and description logics. In Proc. ICCS’98, LNCS 1453, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. de Nivelle. A resolution decision procedure for the guarded fragment. In Proc. CADE-15, LNCS 1421, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. M. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and W. Nutt. The complexity of concept languages. Information and Computation, 134(1):1–58, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. M. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and A. Schaerf. Reasoning in description logics. In Foundation of Knowledge Representation, CSLI-Publications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Grädel. On the restraining power of guards. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1999. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Kerdiles and E. Salvat. A sound and complete CG proof procedure combining projections with analytic tableaux. In Proc. ICCS’97, LNCS 1257, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. L. Mugnier and M. Chein. Polynomial algorithms for projection and matching. In Proc. 7th Workshop on Conceptual Structures, 1992, LNCS 754, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John F. Sowa. Conceptual Structures. Addison-Wesley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. van Benthem. Dynamic Bits and Pieces. Technical Report LP-1997-01, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Wermelinger. Conceptual graphs and first-order logic. In Proc. ICCS’95, LNCS 954, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Molitor, R., Tobies, S. (1999). Tractable and Decidable Fragments of Conceptual Graphs. In: Tepfenhart, W.M., Cyre, W. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Standards and Practices. ICCS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1640. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48659-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48659-3_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66223-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48659-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics