Skip to main content

Metropolis vs Kawasaki Dynamic for Image Segmentation Based on Gibbs Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1654))

Abstract

In this paper we investigate several dynamics to optimize a posterior distribution defined to solve segmentation problems. We first consider the Metropolis and the Kawasaki dynamics. We also compare the associated Bayesian cost functions. The Kawasaki dynamic appears to provide better results but requires the exact values of the class ratios. Therefore, we define alternative dynamics which conserve the properties of the Kawasaki dynamic and require only an estimation of the class ratios. We show on synthetic data that these new dynamics can improve the segmentation results by incorporating some information on the class ratios. Results are compared using a Potts model as prior distribution.

This work was partially supported by the French-Russian Institute A.M. Liapunov (Grant 98-02)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Chellappa, A. Jain. Markov random fields: theory and application. Academic Press, Inc., 1993. Collective work.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Geman, D. Geman. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6):721–741, 1984.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. H. O. Georgii. Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions. De Gruyter-Studies in Mathematics, 1988. Vol. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Maruani, E. Pechersky, M. Sigelle. On Gibbs fields in image processing. Markov Processes and Related Fields, 1:419–442, 1995.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Prum. Processus sur un réseau et mesures de Gibbs (in French), chapter 9, Dynamic of Ising systems, pages 150–162. Masson, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Besag. Spatial interaction and statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 36:721–741, 1974.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Derin, H. Elliott. Modelling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Gibbs random fields. IEEE trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9(1):39–55, January 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Lakshmanan, H. Derin. Simultaneous parameter estimation and segmentation of Gibbs random fields using simulated annealing. IEEE trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(8):799–813, August 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. X. Descombes, J.F. Mangin, E. Pechersky, M. Sigelle. Fine structures preserving model for image processing. In Proc. 9th SCIA 95 Uppsala, Sweden, pages 349–356, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. D. Morris, X. Descombes, J. Zerubia. The Ising/Potts model is not well suited to segmentation tasks. In proc. IEEE Digital Signal Processing Worshop, 1996. Sept. 1–4 1996, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Press, S. Teukolski, W. Vetterling, B. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Wolberg, T. Pavlidis. Restoration of binary images using stochastic relaxation with annealing. Pattern Recognition Letters, 3:375–388, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Tjelmeland, J. Besag. Markov Random Fields with higher order interactions. submitted to JASA. Preprint.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Descombes, X., Pechersky, E. (1999). Metropolis vs Kawasaki Dynamic for Image Segmentation Based on Gibbs Models. In: Hancock, E.R., Pelillo, M. (eds) Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. EMMCVPR 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1654. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48432-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48432-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66294-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48432-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics