An Agent Based System for Intelligent Collaborative Filtering
This paper describes a multi-agent approach to collaborative filtering. The system combines traditional content filtering (using a semantic network representation and a spreading activation search for comparison) and social filtering (achieved via agent communication which is effectively triggered by user feedback). Collaborative relationships form between the agents as agents learn to trust or distrust other agents. The system aids users in overcoming the problem of information overload by presenting, on a daily basis, a ‘personalised newspaper’ comprising articles relevant to the user.
KeywordsSemantic Network Collaborative Filter User Feedback Collaborative Relationship Trust Level
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.N. Belkin and B. Croft. Information_ltering and information retrieval: Two sides of the same coin? Communications of the ACM, 35(2), December 1992.Google Scholar
- 5.C. Guilfoyle. Vendors of agent technology. UNICOM Seminar on Intelligent Agents and their Business Applications, pages 135–142, 1995.Google Scholar
- 7.W. Hill, L. Stead, M. Rosenstein, and G. Furnas. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. Computer-Human Interfaces (CHI’ 95), 1994.Google Scholar
- 9.H.S. Nwana. Software agents: An overview. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(3):1–40, 1996.Google Scholar
- 10.P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Reidl. Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. Proceedings of ACM 1994 Conference on CSCW, pages 175–186, 1994.Google Scholar
- 11.Colm O’ Riordan. Multi-Agent Collaborative Filtering. Msc. Thesis, University College Cork, 1997.Google Scholar
- 12.U. Shardanand and P. Maes. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth”. Computer-Human Interfaces (CHI’ 95), 1995.Google Scholar
- 14.H. Sorensen, A. O’Riordan, and C. O’Riordan. Personal profiling with the informer filtering agent. Journal Of Universal Computer Science, 3(8), 1996.Google Scholar