Abstract
When we speak, we often use nonliteral utterances in which the meaning intended is different from the literal meaning. So, we must be able to differentiate what the speaker says from what he wants to say, using contextual information to understand the speaker’s intention and to make assumptions, predictions and inferences.The aim of this study is to determine whether there exists a hierarchy of complexity between various nonliteral speech acts. In other words, does an indirect request, for instance, require more processing to be understood than an ironic statement ? Some evidence was found for the existence of a hierarchy of complexity. Results emphasizes the particular role of “conventionality” and confirm the idea that conversational rules are very strongly dependent upon context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford Clarendon Press
Brownell HH et. al. (1986) Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 27: 310–321
Clark HH (1979) Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive psychology 11: 430–477
Gibbs RW (1982) A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourse. Text 2: 9–28
Grice HP (1975), Logic and Conversation. In Cole P and Morgan JL (eds). Syntax and Semantics vol 3 Speech Acts. Academic Press
Searle JR (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press
Searle JR (1979) Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press
Vanderveken D (1988) Les actes de discours. Mardaga, Bruxelles
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Champagne, M., Virbel, J., Nespoulous, JL. (1999). The Differential (?) Processing of Literal and Nonliteral Speech Acts : A Psycholinguistic Approach. In: Bouquet, P., Benerecetti, M., Serafini, L., Brézillon, P., Castellani, F. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48315-2_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48315-2_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66432-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48315-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive