Advertisement

Document Analysis Systems Development and Representation through the Object-Process Methodology

  • Dov Dori
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1655)

Abstract

Object-Process Methodology (OPM) calls for integrated system development, supported by Object-Process CASE Tool - OPCAT-a Computer Aided Software Engineering tool, which supports development and standard representation of industrial systems. OPCAT is designed to provide an Integrated System Engineering Environment (ISEE). Due to their generic nature and comprehensiveness, OPM and OPCAT are suitable for both developing Document Analysis Systems (DAS’s) and representing them in a clear and standard way. We present the principles of OPM and show how it can be used as an ISEE for generic DAS development.

Keywords

Unify Modeling Language Electronic Document Document Generation Paper Document Computer Integrate Manufacture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Reference

  1. 1.
    D. Dori, Object-Process Analysis: Maintaining the Balance Between System Structure and Behavior. Journal of Logic and Computation. 5 (2) 227–249, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Dori, Unifying System Structure and Behavior through Object-Process Analysis. Journal of Object-Oriented Analysis, July-August, 66–73, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Dori and M. Goodman, On Bridging the Analysis-Design and Structure-Behavior Grand Canyons with Object Paradigms. Report on Object Analysis and Design, 2 (5), 25–35, January-February 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Dori and M. Goodman, From Object-Process Analysis to Object-Process Design, Annals of Software Engineering, 2, 20–25, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Booch, G., Jacobson, I., and Rumbaugh, J., Unified Modeling Language (UML) Notation Guide Version 1.1, Rational Software Corporation, September 1 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Dori and Y.J. Dori, Object-Process Analysis of a Hypertext Organic Chemistry Studyware, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 1/2, (1996),65–84.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Dori, Object-Process Analysis of Computer Integrated Manufacturing Documentation and Inspection Functions. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 9 (5), 339–353, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Meyersdorf and D. Dori, The R&D Universe and Its Feedback Cycles: an Object-Process Analysis R&D Management, 27 (4), 333–344, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Peleg and D. Dori, Extending the Object-Process Methodology to Handle Real-Time Systems. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming (to appear).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Dori, Representing Pattern Recognition Embedded Systems through Object-Process Diagrams: the Case of the Machine Drawing Understanding System Pattern Recognition Letters 16 (4), 377–384, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Dori, Arc Segmentation in the Machine Drawing Understanding Environment IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 17 (1), 1057–1068, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Dori and M. Weiss, A Scheme for 3D Object Reconstruction from Dimensioned Orthographic Views, Engineering Applications in Artificial Intelligence 9 (1), 53–64, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dov Dori and Hagit Hel-Or: Semantic Content-Based Image Retrieval Using Object-Process Diagrams. In A. Amin, D. Dori, P. Pudil and H. Freeman (Eds.) Advances in Pattern Recognition, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1451, 230–241, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dov Dori
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations